I ended up spending the week-end learning a bit of scheme and submitted a
patch via the bug report https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765920
I assume developers will see it that way. With my patch, it retains the
existing option (where the running balance is retrieved from the account
along
Yes, I think a clarification would be useful in the interim til the
option is fixed.
Regards,
Adrien
On 10/26/22 7:53 PM, Vincent Dawans wrote:
Yes it is indeed a simplified example I was using. And your second example
is the one that indeed I show as working (the one with all
expense accounts
Yes it is indeed a simplified example I was using. And your second example
is the one that indeed I show as working (the one with all
expense accounts; in my example I just have 2 -- dining and clothes). That
as long as all transactions are included in the time period. But as soon as
you use one of
It could just be that you're providing a simplified example, but in that
screenshot I noticed every single line had the Checking Account as the
'Transfer' account. (other account)
Why not just run the report on the Checking Account only?
It would then give you a running balance that makes sens
Nope, the first one came through the list just fine.
Regards,
Adrien
On 10/26/22 4:24 PM, Vincent Dawans wrote:
[Ooops I think I messed up my reply to/cc mix, so trying again -- still new
to this mailing list thing]
___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnu
[Ooops I think I messed up my reply to/cc mix, so trying again -- still new
to this mailing list thing]
Thank you Adrien. I would expect a running balance starting with the first
transaction amount and ending with the last transaction as sorted. As if
you were putting a list of transactions in Exc
Thank you Adrien. I would expect a running balance starting with the first
transaction amount and ending with the last transaction as sorted. As if
you were putting a list of transactions in Excel and simply creating a
running balance by adding the previous line's running balance+current line.
In f
Perhaps a clarification as you mentioned would be best and easiest for now.
I'd dare ask, if you're sorting primarily by date, with multiple
accounts selected, what do you want the running balance to be? Just
those accounts? (is that even useful?) Or the entire Book?
Any of those could get qu
Hello. Seeking some feedback on this particular question.
The transaction report has a "Running Balance" option in the display
settings. Also by default the transaction report sorts and groups
transactions by account. In that context, the "Running Balance" option
shows the running balance within e