> I have to use GPG for windows.For that i have installed GPG4Win in my
> system and try to use it through C++ code using DLL libgpgme-glib-11.
> Getting "Invalid crytpto Engine" while calling "gpgme_engine_check_version".
Where are you getting libgpgme-glib-11.dll? My copy of GnuPG provides
thes
Hi team,
Could you please send me the gnupg-2.1.21 installation steps by using
librarys solaris10 and rhel6&7 I am not able access gnupg http from Unix
server because of proxy so downloaded all libs and gnupg pkg ,
Rajesh
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:35:55 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> A bit more verbosely, if no scdaemon exists you will get an error
> value that was not suppressed for a few versions, you can safely
> ignore the warning and it is fixed in alter versions again, or you can
> install/build gnupg wit
On 07/27/2017 05:29 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 23:41:23 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 07/24/2017 04:27 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
>>> The file is signed and can be verified. Just wondering (after
>>> googling) what this means, because i have no card reader etc. for
>>> G
On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 23:41:23 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 07/24/2017 04:27 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> > The file is signed and can be verified. Just wondering (after
> > googling) what this means, because i have no card reader etc. for
> > GnuPG.
>
> https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitw
Hello All,
I have to use GPG for windows.For that i have installed GPG4Win in my system
and try to use it through C++ code using DLL libgpgme-glib-11.
Getting "Invalid crytpto Engine" while calling "gpgme_engine_check_version".
Plz find the code snippet::
void _stdcall LoadGPG()
{
gpgme_error_t
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 14:23:44 +0200
Peter Lebbing wrote:
> Now let's get on to a passphrase manager and GnuPG specifically. A
> different way to look at it is this: would you use GnuPG to protect
> your passphrase manager? This is actually a feature request I've seen
> multiple times: please provi
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:46:33 +0200
Peter Lebbing wrote:
[...]
> shared the passphrase. If you can't remember which is 1 and which is
> 2, use something you can recognise. For instance, if the pinentry
> asks you "Please unlock key 0x6228A8BC", you could append a C, the
> very last digit of the id
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 12:27:30 +0100
MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> wrote:
>
> The single point of failure stops being a passphrase used across
> multiple keys; it becomes the password required to open the password
> manager that protects the multiple passphrases.
I already use a p
On 27/07/17 13:27, MFPA wrote:
> I guess I should have trimmed my quote less severely. Using a password
> manager would enable somebody who says they cannot remember multiple
> decent-quality unique passwords to not share passwords between
> different keys.
Ah yes :-). I agree.
> The single point
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thursday 27 July 2017 at 10:46:33 AM, in
, Peter
Lebbing wrote:-
> On 27/07/17 11:24, MFPA wrote:
>> Have you considered using a password manager to
>> remember them?
> What would be the purpose?
I guess I should have trimmed my quote less s
On 27/07/17 11:24, MFPA wrote:
> Have you considered using a password manager to remember them?
What would be the purpose?
I already fail to see the problem of GnuPG filling in a passphrase it
already knows... surely an attacker would try the same thing as well, I
don't know what GnuPG not trying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wednesday 26 July 2017 at 8:08:28 PM, in
, Mario Figueiredo wrote:-
> The sharing of passwords between different keys
> becomes inevitable
> after a certain threshold. And I suspect for
> everyone, not just old
> people.
Have you considered
13 matches
Mail list logo
