On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:52 PM NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think that your configuration of smartcard is somehow broken.
>
The only thing I have been able to confirm is that gpg, at some point after
2.0.22, stopped allowing the use of the same subkey in multiple slots. As
soon as I
On Wed, 2019-10-16 at 20:26 +0200, David Hebbeker wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-10-16 at 14:19 +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 22:23, David Hebbeker said:
> > > The manual [1] says that GnuPG can automatically retrieve keys
> > > for emails in the "u...@example.com" form. Does this
Hello
I have a question about libgcrypt license
We can find following license notice
Libgcrypt is distributed under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
License (LGPLv2.1+). The helper programs as well as the documentation are
distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License
On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 00:59 +0100, MFPA via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Monday 21 October 2019 at 6:09:17 AM, in
> , Robert J.
> Hansen wrote:-
>
> > Due to Yahoo! Groups closing, the PGPNET mailing list
> > has moved to
> > groups.io;
>
> I thought PGPNET's move was prompted by degraded
> I thought PGPNET's move was prompted by degraded performance on the
> yahoogroups platform, which lead some group members to look around and
> find something that worked better.
What I know is this: I was asked by a PGPNET member to change the
address, and the cause for the change was the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Monday 21 October 2019 at 6:09:17 AM, in
, Robert J.
Hansen wrote:-
> Due to Yahoo! Groups closing, the PGPNET mailing list
> has moved to
> groups.io;
I thought PGPNET's move was prompted by degraded performance on the
yahoogroups
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 20 October 2019 at 3:20:41 PM, in
, Uwe Brauer via Gnupg-users wrote:-
> I just found that
> https://extrassl.actalis.it/portal/uapub/doProcess
> Provides a free smime certificate.
[...]
> does somebody know whether there is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 20 October 2019 at 3:20:41 PM, in
, Uwe Brauer via Gnupg-users wrote:-
> I just found that
> https://extrassl.actalis.it/portal/uapub/doProcess
> Provides a free smime certificate.
[...]
> does somebody know whether there is a
Hi all,
I was wondering if native English speakers can help me out in finding 'the
right' 5 letter words which can be used in an binary to words encoder/decoder,
which then can be used with GnuPG encrypted binary files, so that these
(preferably small binary blobs) messages can then be send over
> Werner's implementation has an excellent reputation, and it's the only one
> I personally trust completely.
You state this so matter-of-factly, I feel compelled to point out that among
cryptographers, libgcrypt's reputation is not all that great...
>> GnuPG has steadfastly refused to create an OpenPGP library programmers
>> can use directly,
>
> I was under the impression that gpgme is just such a library.
It is not. Under the hood, GPGME works by launching an entirely new
process and directing it via interprocess communication.
El día lunes, octubre 21, 2019 a las 07:32:48p. m. +0200, Matthias Apitz
escribió:
>
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to insert a new password into my password store, but I can't do
> so anymore. It says:
>
> $ pass insert -m web/test3
> Enter contents of web/test3 and press Ctrl+D when finished:
>
>
Hello,
I wanted to insert a new password into my password store, but I can't do
so anymore. It says:
$ pass insert -m web/test3
Enter contents of web/test3 and press Ctrl+D when finished:
gpg: 61F1ECB625C9A6C3: There is no assurance this key belongs to the named user
gpg: [stdin]: encryption
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20191021160908.4_hgk%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|Vincent Breitmoser wrote in <2UJQOP6NMJE80.2FS52GC36TCEU@my.amazin.horse>:
||> Especially if the key is shipped alongside the message already
||
||Are you sure that it is though? Seems to me you're giving out ill-informed
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20191021160908.4_hgk%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
'Just want to add that the DKIM i refer to in my first message is
in my eyes not a solution but a desastrous demolition ball
of the mail standard, and as such hatred by me, and the reply-to:
that was pointing to Tony Lane's real
Vincent Breitmoser wrote in <2UJQOP6NMJE80.2FS52GC36TCEU@my.amazin.horse>:
|
|> Especially if the key is shipped alongside the message already
|
|Are you sure that it is though? Seems to me you're giving out ill-informed
|advice here.
Bad advice of mine yes, PGP does not do it the way S/MIME
Hello,
We received a report from one of our users who was unable to get GnuPG
to fetch keys from behind a HTTP proxy [1]. From our investigation, it
seems that GnuPG does not even try to use the proxy if the system does
not have a DNS server configured. In particular, the log posted at [2]
> Actually, the Enigmail / GnuPG duo is one of the best examples of how
> different software parts could work together, thus increasing the
> prevalence of both parts by magnitudes, pushing a technique which the
> world really needs, and making it usable for the masses. Enigmail /
> GnuPG is by
On 19.10.2019 17:20, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
>
>> Why not stick with that and focus on what has made Enigmail
>> successful?
> What is the reason in your eyes that made Enigmail successful?
>
It is the ingenious mixture of integration / ease-of-use on one hand
(setting it up (normally) is
On 21/10/2019 06:09, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Due to Yahoo! Groups closing
I know it doesn't really matter here and now but Yahoo Groups is not
closing. It's only the ancillary services that are being deleted. Yahoo
Groups continues in service as a very basic mail list service (with no
archive),
20 matches
Mail list logo
