CVSROOT:/cvsroot/gnustep
Module name:gnustep
Branch:
Changes by: Richard Frith-Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/10/23
06:35:33
Modified files:
core/base : ChangeLog
core/base/Documentation: Base.gsdoc
core/base/Source: NSPathUtilities.m
Alex,
--- Alex Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is what permanent HTTP redirects are for. Please, if we were to go
> the route of moving, don't request that a nasty page with a "please
> click on the link below or a meta-redirect be set up when there is a
> proper solution (HTTP redire
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 09:20:53PM -0600, Adam Fedor wrote:
> No, they will not do that. We could just as easily decide to make our
> project non-free and then tell everyone to delete their free copies of
> the project. I don't think that would go over well :-)
Ah, well, I think most of the dev
Gregory John Casamento wrote:
Adam,
--- Adam Fedor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2005-10-18 18:36:23 -0600 Andrew Ruder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Gna.org's hosting service has been nixed more or less by most. I
don't think that this is worth pursuing because of the overall
negative
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 08:56:50PM -0500, Andrew Ruder wrote:
> Is there anything in particular keeping you at savannah? The way I see
> it, if savannah is unable to keep up with changing times and there is
> another FSF ran service that can, there's really no reason to feel like
> we must stay wi
On Oct 22, 2005, at 7:56 PM, Andrew Ruder wrote:
Perhaps we can have the savannah folks disable it?
No, they will not do that. We could just as easily decide to make our
project non-free and then tell everyone to delete their free copies of
the project. I don't think that would go over w
On Oct 22, 2005, at 5:53 AM, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
Yes, and I'd like to add to this: we need to simplify the way people
report
bugs. Remember the BugNeXT application?
(http://www.levenez.com/NeXTSTEP/Demos.html) It's was a simple and
fast way how
to bug the developers at NeXT about their. If
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:50:39PM -0600, Adam Fedor wrote:
> On 2005-10-18 18:36:23 -0600 Andrew Ruder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>* Gna.org's hosting service has been nixed more or less by most. I
> > don't think that this is worth pursuing because of the overall
> > negative response.
>
Adam,
--- Adam Fedor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2005-10-18 18:36:23 -0600 Andrew Ruder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> * Gna.org's hosting service has been nixed more or less by most. I
> > don't think that this is worth pursuing because of the overall
> > negative response.
> >
>
Nicolas,
--- Nicolas Roard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/22/05, Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it
> > has
> > become a cause for concern for me.
>
> yes, many people seems to be quite busy irl la
On 10/22/05, Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it hasbecome a cause for concern for me.
yes, many people seems to be quite busy irl lately :-/
I've been doing a lot of thinking and have compiled a list of things
Fred,
--- Fred Kiefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gregory John Casamento wrote:
> > GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it
> has
> > become a cause for concern for me.
> >
>
> Here I have to agree with you. GNUstep is for some time now actually
> usable, but p
Gregory John Casamento wrote:
> GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it has
> become a cause for concern for me.
>
Here I have to agree with you. GNUstep is for some time now actually
usable, but progress and contributions have slowed down a lot. I can
only talk a
I've been with GNUstep over several years now and I agree that it is currently
encountering a state of slow stagnation.
Quoting Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it has
> become a cause for concern for me.
>
> I've
Le 21 oct. 05 à 22:50, Adam Fedor a écrit :
On 2005-10-18 18:36:23 -0600 Andrew Ruder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Gna.org's hosting service has been nixed more or less by most. I
don't think that this is worth pursuing because of the overall
negative response.
I've think I've forgotten
GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it has
become a cause for concern for me.
I've been doing a lot of thinking and have compiled a list of things I believe
that GNUstep needs to address to stay on top of things. The list follows:
1) More apps. Many of the fol
Test results for GNUstep as of Sat Oct 22 06:34:22 EDT 2005
If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will
be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm
If you would like to add your machine to this list, set up a cron job
(make sure you set up your PATH and other envir
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/gnustep
Module name:gnustep
Branch:
Changes by: Richard Frith-Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/10/22
07:53:11
Modified files:
core/gui : ChangeLog
core/gui/Tools : make_services.m
Log message:
Attempt to get list of di
18 matches
Mail list logo
