All,
I am going to start reviewing those parts of GNUstep that I am a direct
contributor to for movement to the GPLv3 or LGPLv3 where appropriate, namely
gnustep-gui and Gorm. Fred, please help me look at gui for any issues
regarding this move. I believe for those packages it will be simple
Hi!
My name is Chris Elsmore and I'm one of the SoC students working on
GNUstep over the summer, focusing on the Text System.
In response to Adams mail, currently I have familiarised myself with
the system, read Cocoa documentation with regard to Text storage,
layout & management, and als
Gregory John Casamento wrote:
> All,
>
> I am going to start reviewing those parts of GNUstep that I am a direct
> contributor to for movement to the GPLv3 or LGPLv3 where appropriate, namely
> gnustep-gui and Gorm. Fred, please help me look at gui for any issues
> regarding this move. I be
Fred,
I'm going to respond to these one by one:
> Status of back
> ==
>
> Tools
> -
> font_cacher LGPL2 and includes directly a file with LGPL2
Is the included file that is LGPL2 assigned to the FSF?
> gpbs GPL2, includes a file with LGPL 2 which could be removed without
> loo
On Jul 11, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
My suggestion would be to put everything in gui and back into LPGL
even
tools and bundles. This will make the reuse of code a lot easier.
I would like to see what the other maintainers say with respect to
doing this before making
