On 22 Feb 2009, at 12:58, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
On 22 Feb 2009, at 12:42, David Chisnall wrote:
It sounds like a good thing to have the option of resuming, even
though it's generally not advisable.
Do you have a patch for gcc/libobjc which would allow that?
It won't require patch
Hi,
David Chisnall wrote:
> On 7 Mar 2009, at 08:30, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
>
>> - I do not want any additional runtime overhead. Performance needs to be
>> maximum. Always.
>
> Don't use Objective-C then. The language compromises performance for
> flexibility all of the time. How much in GNUst
On Mar 8, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Quentin Mathé wrote:
Also who is going to be in charge of the joint application? Someone
from GNUstep? That sounds likely since it's the umbrella project for
the application.
I applied for GNUstep last year, so I could do that.
__
