--- Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What would you say is the scientific accuracy of
> anything in the Bible? I am asking you because you
> seem to question the accuracy of scientific methods
> like radiocarbon dating. Would 195,000 years be
> outside the margin of accuracy of Bib
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Hello,
>Here are links to three articles discussing quite
>convincingly a creationist view point.
>
Orlando,
There is a lot of self-published pseudoscientific
literature on creationism on the web and in print. It
appears "convincing" only to believers, lay people
- Original Message -
>From: "Peter D'Souza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To:
>Sent: 28 February, 2005 6:41 PM
>Subject: [Goanet] Evolution (contd)
>Elsewhere in this post I have
>explained the seeming consistency in an evolutionist's belief that man
m
Hi Peter,
Your latest post under the above thread did appear on
Goanet (Please see the archives). Therefore, I am
posting this reply. Here are my responses to your
points.
Peter D'Souza wrote:
>
>You are incorrect in stating that he assumed a
>constant_ growth rate. In fact, this is what he did
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Santosh Helekar said:
SH> I have to say that your understanding of the article
SH> is completely off. What you state above refers only to
SH> the first couple of paragraphs of that article with
SH> quite revealing title of "Evolution and the Population
