I noticed that after deleting entities, the statistics don't update
with the new numbers (even after the last updated time becomes
current). It seems to only be able to increase and not decrease. Is
this a bug?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:38 PM, prgmratlarge wrote:
> > I noticed that after deleting entities, the statistics don't update
> > with the new numbers (even after the last updated time becomes
> > current). It seems to only be able to increase and not decrease. Is
&
Well you can simply set up a script that retrieves your data piece by
piece (where each piece is less than 1MB).
On Jun 3, 1:45 pm, Guilherme Defreitas
wrote:
> If i decide to move away from App Engine, are there any way to export all my
> appengine data bypassing the 1mb limit size?
> How can i
What's "session data"?
On Jun 7, 3:03 pm, "Ikai L (Google)" wrote:
> Are you using any indexes? If you have many properties with lots of indexes
> on them, it's possible the space is taken up by indexes. Another possibility
> is session data.
>
> At any rate, to keep your application going, the q
Just want to make sure: When using get_or_insert(), appengine only
locks that entity group and not the entire Kind?
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.c
So "session data" == "datastore" no?
On Jun 8, 3:18 pm, "Ikai L (Google)" wrote:
> If you're using Java and sessions, this is backed using Memcache and the
> datastore, so you need to run periodic cleanings.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 7
Need a quick and easy way to detect mobile phones from my app, that
won't add too much performance overhead. Any suggestions?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups
e)" wrote:
> Can you use the user-agent?
>
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:12 PM, prgmratlarge wrote:
>
> > Need a quick and easy way to detect mobile phones from my app, that
> > won't add too much performance overhead. Any suggestions?
>
> > --
> >
ue to the size limit: WURFL uses a huge XML file
> > and GAE fails to open the compressed version of the file
> > For now, I have no time to resolve this issue until end of september
>
> > On 23 août, 21:10, "Ikai L (Google)" wrote:
> >> Can you use the user
On 23 août, 21:10, "Ikai L (Google)" wrote:
>
> > > Can you use the user-agent?
>
> > > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:12 PM, prgmratlarge
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > Need a quick and easy way to detect mobile phones from my app, that
> > > &
the LD
> algoritm. And a trie in substitution to RIS.
>
> On Aug 27, 12:11 am, prgmratlarge wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yes, but the CPU required to do a lookup is simply not worth it.
> > Remember, every time a (new) user hits the site you do a lookup. It
> > can add up very qui
algoritm. And a trie in substitution to RIS.
>
> On Aug 27, 12:11 am, prgmratlarge wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yes, but the CPU required to do a lookup is simply not worth it.
> > Remember, every time a (new) user hits the site you do a lookup. It
> > can add up very quickly.
based WURFL web service, but it is not yet released as open-
> source. Do you think it is a possible solution?
>
> To lower the WURFL cpu time can be useful a servlet filter with some
> heuristics to determine if the request came from a mobile device or
> not. without involving WURFL
Set any page as admin only, and then try to view it in the same
browser your testing from. You will be prompted to "login". Login as
admin, and go back to the test page, where it should now work.
On Aug 29, 4:50 am, saintthor wrote:
> test incomeing email in development server. when i send the te
Is there any possible workaround for the issue:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1800 ?
Does anyone (from Google) know when this might be fixed?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group
Quoting from
http://code.google.com/appengine/kb/postpreviewpricing.html#scheduler_knobs_affect_billing
Max Idle Instances: Decreasing this value will likely decrease your
bill as fewer idle instances will typically be running and we will not
charge for any excessive idle instances. In this case
Sign in to Google Checkout, and click Edit payment methods.
No need to disable billing.
On Sep 2, 1:12 pm, thstart wrote:
> I have Billing On for my app. Need to change my credit card.
>
> How to do it? If I disable billing it takes 7 days.
> I just want to switch to another credit card.
--
Yo
Have you looked into using the Blobstore? You can serve the images
without using instances (or cpu).
On Sep 13, 5:30 pm, dloomer wrote:
> I have a simple webcam app used by a maximum of maybe 3 people at any time,
> which also handles requests from a batch process initiated from my house
> which
I tried deploying multiple times to find this error:
Application: [***]; version: 3.
Server: appengine.google.com.
Scanning files on local disk.
Initiating update.
Password for [***]:
Could not guess mimetype for iphone/iui/Thumbs.db. Using application/
octet-stre
am.
Could not guess mimetype for
Hmm... Seems to be fixed... Never mind
On Jan 11, 9:39 pm, prgmratlarge wrote:
> I tried deploying multiple times to find this error:
>
> Application: [***]; version: 3.
> Server: appengine.google.com.
> Scanning files on local disk.
> Initiating update.
> Password for [**
What are strong vs consistent reads?
On Mar 16, 11:31 pm, "Jason (Google)" wrote:
> Hi Everyone. Just a quick note that we just uploaded pre-release 1.3.2
> SDKs for Python and Java to our Google Code project page:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/downloads/list
>
> Both pre-release S
"When implementing the code for Tasks (as worker URLs within your
app), it is important that you consider whether the task is
idempotent. App Engine's Task Queue API is designed to only invoke a
given task once, however it is possible in exceptional circumstances
that a Task may execute multiple ti
ave to be adamant about avoiding the potential
> duplicate e-mail issue to do this sort of thing.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Tim Hoffman wrote:
> > Well could yo record if you sent any particular email, and
> > not resend it ?
>
> > On Mar 18, 6:
If I want to do one process on each entity in my datastore, how do you
think I can best set this up using task queues.
(each process requires a bit of latency)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send ema
i L (Google)" wrote:
> You'd probably pick a batch size, then iterate over it with Task
> Queues and cursors, storing the cursor somewhere to be used by the
> next executed task:
>
> http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/queriesandindexe...
>
> On Wed, Mar
How can I run a cron job at the 30 minute point on every hour. I don't
want it to go every half hour -- i want it to go on every half hour of
the hour. So it should specifically run at:
1:30,2:30,3:30,etc...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Ap
== 30:
> # do whatever
>
> Or if you don't trust the App Engine Cron runs every minute,
>
> if min >= 30:
> if !checkLog(year, month, day, hour):
> saveLog(year, month, day, hour)
> # do whatever
>
> Shinichi
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 25,
I've been thinking of using the fact that taskqueue names cannot be
duplicated to my advantage. But how reliable is this "fact." Is there
ANY chance that the taskqueue will indeed be enqueued again?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine"
The reason for this is because appengine retries the task if it
returns an error...
One way to work around this is to put the email sending in a try/
except clause so that if it does get an error it would not still
return okay. And, at the same time, you can do whatever you want to
process the err
I understand that the best way to obtain the ability to send email
from a specific address is to invite as a developer. I currently have
a domain name using Google Apps, and I have one email account which
receives email through various nicknames/aliases. I would like to know
what the best way to en
+1 the same happens to me all the time
On Apr 9, 11:08 am, Ray Malone wrote:
> I know there is an issue open on sending mail and the API erroring
> out. My code will try again and logs if the email was sent to prevent
> dups, but, I'm being charged for emails that are not being sent. The
> emai
I understand. And I began creating all the addresses as developers,
until I hit an error. It seems there's a maximum of 15 developers per
app. So there goes that idea...
On Apr 9, 3:48 am, "Wesley C (Google)" wrote:
> unfortunately at this point, we do not allow arbitrary email addresses
> as sen
I believe you cannot use an identifier if it is being used as a Gmail
account (unless it's the name of your account)
On Apr 10, 8:43 am, TrungH wrote:
> I have been surprised often by the application identifiers which I can
> not use.
>
> Are there any restrictions posed on them? There are a few
I want to use the send_mail_to_admins function -- but don't want all
my admins receiving the message. Just the one(s) I want.
Right now, even if I specify a "to" address, it still goes to all of
them.
Any help?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Googl
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:23 AM, prgmratlarge wrote:
> > I want to use the send_mail_to_admins function -- but don't want all
> > my admins receiving the message. Just the one(s) I want.
>
> > Right now, even if I specify a "to" address
I would like to send an email to just one of my admin emails, and I
want it to come off the "admin email" quota, as opposed to the normal
quota. Both of the following possibilities failed:
* Sending a regular email to the admin's email address still resulted
in me being charged through the regular
e and setup filters to reject the mail not intended for you
> as admin for this app
>
> Subject: [App-Select-yossie] Some Error
>
> filter 1: Accept all mail with "[App-Select-yossie]" in subject
> filter 2: Reject all mail with "[App-Select-" in subject
>
>
Something tells me these include tombstoned tasks...
On Apr 23, 6:43 am, Roberto wrote:
> You might want to star this bug which I've created about the issue -
> I've got a similarly alarming exceeded Task storage quota:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3132
>
> --
> Y
How can I specify where the authentication "cookies" get stored for
appcfg.py ?
Thanks,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group,
eed to do this? There might be another
> solution that may achieve what you want to do.
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:53 AM, prgmratlarge wrote:
> > How can I specify where the authentication "cookies" get stored for
> > appcfg.py ?
>
> > Thanks,
>
> >
I believe I'm using python 2.5. The script I posted before is the
entire script, so no timeouts.
The server side is simply outputting 'a':
self.response.out.write('a')
On Apr 1, 6:34 pm, Jeff S wrote:
> At this point I am suspicious that the timeout error may coming from
> the client side. Whi
41 matches
Mail list logo
