Hi,
I have created my Widget Library using GWT as Maven Project.On top of that
i am applying Some CSS and Images to get responsiveness that has injected
using ClientBundle.When i add this dependency project in some other project
its unable to load the Images from my Widget Library.How to Solve
GWT Widget Library <http://gwt-widget.sourceforge.net/> link that appears
on http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/tools.html shows 503 error for two days
at least.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to
Check this post:
http://swe-strongsteve.blogspot.com/2010/11/creating-re-usable-composites-using-gwt.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubsc
tefan
>
> Am 18.01.2011 18:45, schrieb Thomas Lefort:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Is there a user guide on creating a GWT widget (or not widget)
> > library? and if possible some clues on how to provide a bit of server
> > logic too in the same jar.
>
> > I started one b
.
What library are you planning to create?
Regards,
Stefan
Am 18.01.2011 18:45, schrieb Thomas Lefort:
Is there a user guide on creating a GWT widget (or not widget)
library? and if possible some clues on how to provide a bit of server
logic too in the same jar.
I started one but I am facing a
Is there a user guide on creating a GWT widget (or not widget)
library? and if possible some clues on how to provide a bit of server
logic too in the same jar.
I started one but I am facing a number of issues. Some best practice/
guidelines would be nice.
Thanks
--
You received this message
ot invest in or acquire a company to work on a powerful and
>>complete Widget Library to put others to shame. (after all its Google,
>>right ?!)
>>I can understand why they have not done this so far, because Google
>>have always been about simplicity and investing in more bl
on ...
>
> However one important aspect seem to be neglected for years and not
> aknowledged by GWT team is
> the absense of a powerful Widget library.
>
> The widget set provided by GWT is very basic, and does not include
> many many widgets needed to make more complex UI intera
I've been thinking about this thread for awhile and have decided to
add my two cents.
First, let me say that I'm huge Google and GWT fan. I've been using
GWT for over two years on multiple projects and I really do think its
great. I just bought myself an Android phone and I'd say its the
Windows/M
Thanks all for your support of GWT. We're really glad that what you've
seen so far makes you want even more, and let me officially
acknowledge here that the GWT team very much understands that you want
a powerful widget library. That's why we created the powerful new
CellWidgets
On 17 nov, 03:25, zixzigma wrote:
> I agree with all the issues that were pointed out about Sencha/Ext.
>
> However, comparing GXT to GWT is comparing apples to oranges.
>
> GXT is only a widget library, you can certainly build applications out
> of just putting together som
+1
On Nov 17, 10:25 am, zixzigma wrote:
> I agree with all the issues that were pointed out about Sencha/Ext.
>
> However, comparing GXT to GWT is comparing apples to oranges.
>
> GXT is only a widget library, you can certainly build applications out
> of just putting tog
I agree with all the issues that were pointed out about Sencha/Ext.
However, comparing GXT to GWT is comparing apples to oranges.
GXT is only a widget library, you can certainly build applications out
of just putting together some widgets.
but to develop scalable apps with great user
The new editor framework is easily worth 100 GXT widget libraries.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
goo
I agree with Thomas, but on the other hand it would be nice to have
some more core functionality by default like drag and drop, fx or
something like a light weight (and easy customizable through own
stylesheets) tree widget (without any icons, mouseover styles etc.).
So I also agree with zixzigma.
On 16 November 2010 10:16, Stephen Haberman wrote:
>> I completely agree with Thomas on this one.
>
> Me too.
>
>> I'd much prefer the GWT team to keep pumping out more function over form.
>
> Agreed!
If the OP and everyone who "+1"d his request each created a single
widget you'd already have a n
> I completely agree with Thomas on this one.
Me too.
> I'd much prefer the GWT team to keep pumping out more function over form.
Agreed!
- Stephen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to g
I completely agree with Thomas on this one. Just look at GXT apps for
another example. By GWT not having slick looking widgets, it forces a
developer to create a look and feel for their own apps. I'd much
prefer the GWT team to keep pumping out more function over form.
Chad Bourque
www.milamade.co
On 16 nov, 17:33, har_shan wrote:
> This should be there in almost all developer's wish list who are using
> GWT.
Er, absolutely not. I'm more than happy with a widget set that gives
me a total latitude towards how my app will look like. That's one of
the biggest issues of Sencha: more than hal
This should be there in almost all developer's wish list who are using
GWT.
zixzigma,
thanks for bringing up this and i think its better to log a feature
request in Issues list and get more stars (than to get +1 in the post)
in it to draw more attention..
On Nov 16, 3:50 pm, Marcin Misiewicz w
+1
On Nov 15, 11:05 pm, Jaroslav Záruba
wrote:
> +1 (Isn't there a enhancement request for this?)
>
> Please make it not only richer, but also sleeker looking.
> I <3 Google but I think the design/look quite often lacks heavily
> behind the service itself, YouTube being one blatant example, IMHO.
+1 (Isn't there a enhancement request for this?)
Please make it not only richer, but also sleeker looking.
I <3 Google but I think the design/look quite often lacks heavily
behind the service itself, YouTube being one blatant example, IMHO. (I
believe Zuckerberg is glad Google does not seem to rea
That's great news.
Thank You
On Nov 15, 1:43 pm, Eric Clayberg wrote:
> FYI...the UiBinder support in GWT Designer is no longer in beta as of
> GWT Designer v8.1 and GWT 2.1.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to thi
FYI...the UiBinder support in GWT Designer is no longer in beta as of
GWT Designer v8.1 and GWT 2.1.
On Nov 13, 1:48 am, zixzigma wrote:
>
> Google acquired Instantiations(GWT Designer) a while ago, which was
> great news,
> although many are waiting for them to add UiBinder feature(still in
> be
+1
On Nov 15, 3:14 pm, Stefan Bachert wrote:
> On 13 Nov., 07:48, zixzigma wrote:
>
> > But a boy can dream !
>
> > All I Want for Christmas is a powerful Widget Library !
> > a mix between Ext (Application-Oriented) and JQuery plugins (Designer
> > oriented/e
I agree. We need a robust framework which is pretty to look at too.
I would rather use code coming out of google than anywhere else to be very
honest.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:02 AM, massimo malvestio <
massimo.malves...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am dreaming from a designed con
>
> Hi,
>
> I am dreaming from a designed conceptually stable GWT.
> Each year I had to change app due to API-change on concept level!
>
> Even if I understand your needs, I've been in the same situation, I think
it's quite normal that a framework during early years of development could
have an exp
On 13 Nov., 07:48, zixzigma wrote:
> But a boy can dream !
>
> All I Want for Christmas is a powerful Widget Library !
> a mix between Ext (Application-Oriented) and JQuery plugins (Designer
> oriented/eye candy/effects) !
Hi,
I am dreaming from a designed conceptually stable
+1.
SmartGWT LGPL is the only option for those who don't have lot of time and/or
money to use GWT and still be productive.
If GWT has a decent Table/Grid, Tree, then a lot of users will be content in
just using GWT. Now that Designer is also part of the Google, the next step
would be for Google t
+1
I am currently doing the GWT project honeycrm
http://code.google.com/p/honeycrm/.
A more powerful set of widget is the very last thing that is missing
in the GWT puzzle.
On 15 Nov., 09:39, massimo malvestio
wrote:
> +1
> I'm currently learning SmartGWT, LGPL version.
> I obviously can't take
+1
I'm currently learning SmartGWT, LGPL version.
I obviously can't take advantage of everything newly introduced and waited
for a long time, like MPV, I had to wrote my own implementation 3 years ago
to decouple code, and now I have to use their good implementation, but
exiting from GWT standard,
t; However one important aspect seem to be neglected for years and not
> aknowledged by GWT team is
> the absense of a powerful Widget library.
>
> The widget set provided by GWT is very basic, and does not include
> many many widgets needed to make more complex UI interaction possib
+1
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Prashant wrote:
> +1
>
> On 15 November 2010 03:50, Jambi wrote:
>
>> I definitely agree! The new CellWidgets are realy nice, but we need
>> more ;)!!
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Google Web Toolkit"
+1
On 15 November 2010 03:50, Jambi wrote:
> I definitely agree! The new CellWidgets are realy nice, but we need
> more ;)!!
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@
I definitely agree! The new CellWidgets are realy nice, but we need
more ;)!!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send em
..
>
> However one important aspect seem to be neglected for years and not
> aknowledged by GWT team is
> the absense of a powerful Widget library.
>
> The widget set provided by GWT is very basic, and does not include
> many many widgets needed to make more complex UI interaction possib
not
aknowledged by GWT team is
the absense of a powerful Widget library.
The widget set provided by GWT is very basic, and does not include
many many widgets needed to make more complex UI interaction possible.
Drag and Drop (Tree for example or Grid, Filter), Calendar, Combo Box,
Complex grids
Hello all,
when doing some research and studying in the source code of
SpeedTracer I observed that it uses topspin.jar as a widget library
(http://code.google.com/p/speedtracer/source/browse/#svn/trunk/src/
client/ui/lib).
Does anyone have more information about this library? I've found
GWT-EXT is a solid library. The only major drawback is that they do
not support versions of EXT past 2.0(.6?) when the commercial license
kicked in.. The main developer moved to work on SmartGWT after the
license "switcheroo" that Ext pulled.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Another library is ExtGWT http://www.extjs.com/products/gxt/
2009/10/3 mikedshaffer :
>
> You should also take a look at SmartGWT http://code.google.com/p/smartgwt/
>
> On Oct 3, 5:56 am, James wrote:
>> Hello All,
>> I've been looking for the best open source widget libraries to extend
>> GWT
or gwt-mosaic!
On Oct 3, 10:56 pm, Geraldo Lopes wrote:
> Another option:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/
>
> Geraldo
>
> On 3 out, 08:56, James wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello All,
> > I've been looking for the best open source widget libraries to extend
> > GWT 1.6. EXT-GWT
Another option:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/
Geraldo
On 3 out, 08:56, James wrote:
> Hello All,
> I've been looking for the best open source widget libraries to extend
> GWT 1.6. EXT-GWT was very good, but it's not cheap for commercial use.
> Specially there are some
You should also take a look at SmartGWT http://code.google.com/p/smartgwt/
On Oct 3, 5:56 am, James wrote:
> Hello All,
> I've been looking for the best open source widget libraries to extend
> GWT 1.6. EXT-GWT was very good, but it's not cheap for commercial use.
> Specially there are some widg
Hello All,
I've been looking for the best open source widget libraries to extend
GWT 1.6. EXT-GWT was very good, but it's not cheap for commercial use.
Specially there are some widgets we need ie a calendar widget that we
don't want to do home grown if possible. I also looked at GWT-EXT, but
I was
44 matches
Mail list logo