[gwt-contrib] Re: Focus/blur on a group of widgets?

2009-09-06 Thread John Tamplin
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Ed wrote: > I think it would be possible if you use a kind of delayed-pipeline > (pattern): holding on to an event till some condition is met before > forwarding itExample of the condition: till a maximum delay time > is reached and/or the focus of the previous

[gwt-contrib] Re: Comment on UsingOOPHM in google-web-toolkit

2009-09-06 Thread brett.wooldridge
I am able to use Mac/OOPHM/Firefox3.5. Did you follow the directions (and discussions) on this page? http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/OophmForMacBasedGwtContributors On the other hand, I didn't use the provided link (Firefox) ... I built the plugin. Brett On Sep 6, 11:07 am, c

[gwt-contrib] Re: New API proposal: BatchedCommand

2009-09-06 Thread brett.wooldridge
As a long time Java programmer (since v0.9!), I'd just like to throw in that I don't see any particular practical benefit to leveraging Runnable or Callable. Sure, they are just interfaces, and you could re-use them. But beyond that, especially with respect to Callable, almost nothing execution

[gwt-contrib] Re: Focus/blur on a group of widgets?

2009-09-06 Thread Ed
I asked around on the net and got the idea that it's not possible at all. I think because these events are received from the underlying OS and simple forwarded, which makes sense I think it would be possible if you use a kind of delayed-pipeline (pattern): holding on to an event till some con

[gwt-contrib] Comment on OophmForMacBasedGwtContributors in google-web-toolkit

2009-09-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by jon.hanson: Thanks monika7, those steps appear to have worked for me. For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/OophmForMacBasedGwtContributors --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contr