Am 03.07.20 um 20:17 schrieb Davide Cittaro:
> Would it make sense to get a graph from partitions (where edges are weighted
> on connectivity among them) and apply NSBM then? This would produce a mixed
> model where the deepest level is actually a PP, and the hierarchy doesn't
> assume any const
Hi Tiago,
> On 3 Jul 2020, at 19:05, Tiago de Paula Peixoto wrote:
>
> Hi Davide,
>
> Am 03.07.20 um 11:31 schrieb Davide Cittaro:
>> Hello,
>> I'm testing the new Planted Partition model in graph-tool on my data, indeed
>> I'm finding interesting results. I have some questions/observations,
Hi Davide,
Am 03.07.20 um 11:31 schrieb Davide Cittaro:
> Hello,
> I'm testing the new Planted Partition model in graph-tool on my data, indeed
> I'm finding interesting results. I have some questions/observations, though.
> - PPBlockState returns a relatively large number of partitions on large
Hello,
I'm testing the new Planted Partition model in graph-tool on my data, indeed
I'm finding interesting results. I have some questions/observations, though.
- PPBlockState returns a relatively large number of partitions on large
networks, which is fine and expected. When I use NSBM, instead,