Martin Landa wrote:
> > However, this feature cannot be used until the GUI's own requirement
> > checking has been adapted to understand it. Currently, if an option
> > marked as ->required is omitted but a flag marked as
> > ->suppress_required is given, the command itself won't complain about
>
Hi,
2010/11/25 Glynn Clements :
> However, this feature cannot be used until the GUI's own requirement
> checking has been adapted to understand it. Currently, if an option
> marked as ->required is omitted but a flag marked as
> ->suppress_required is given, the command itself won't complain abo
Glynn wrote:
> "struct Flag" now has a boolean ->suppress_required
> field. If this field is set on a flag, and that flag is given
> on the command line, the parser won't check whether ->required
> options were provided.
see also
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/886
that would help avoid som
"struct Flag" now has a boolean ->suppress_required field. If this
field is set on a flag, and that flag is given on the command line,
the parser won't check whether ->required options were provided.
This will allow options which are normally required to be marked as
required even if there are sp
