Dear all,
I will rename our default branch currently called master to main in the
following days. We already discussed it here and there, but the rename
should be relatively smooth. Much simpler than the addons repo
reorganization. Users not compiling code themselves should not be affected.
Contri
Here are some screen captures for these same steps, that I created back
in January for the MapServer community:
https://github.com/MapServer/MapServer/wiki/Renamed-Default-Branch
-jeff
--
Jeff McKenna
GatewayGeo: Developers of MS4W, MapServer Consulting and Training
co-founder of FOSS4G
htt
Dear all,
The master branch was renamed to main. Please update your local
repositories and workflows accordingly.
## 1. Local repo update and branch rename
If you are contributing code or compiling source code from Git, you need to
modify your local repository as well. Go to your fork's website
Thank you Vaclav.
Will the same name-update happen for the addons?
Nikos___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Well, since addon repo structure changed and master is no longer used as
base branch, but grass7, and eventually it will be grass8, the name change
does not seem very relevant or urgent there, no?
Not strong opinion though
Vero
El mié, 25 ago 2021 a las 21:21, Nikos Alexandris ()
escribió:
> Th
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 3:32 PM Veronica Andreo
wrote:
> Well, since addon repo structure changed and master is no longer used as
> base branch, but grass7, and eventually it will be grass8, the name change
> does not seem very relevant or urgent there, no?
>
That is correct. A much larger chang
Probably a silly question:
I'm having problems with rebasing my local feature branches for PRs, e.g.
for https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pull/1786
My local main branch is up to date with the official main branch. In my
case the grass repo is the remote named origin, my fork is the remote named
metz
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 1:16 PM Markus Metz
wrote:
> ...
> $ git checkout raster_tempdir
> $ git rebase main
>
> Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/raster_tempdir.
>
> $ git status
> On branch raster_tempdir
> Your branch and 'metzm/raster_tempdir' have diverged,
> and have 48 and 7 diff
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 7:51 PM Vaclav Petras wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 1:16 PM Markus Metz
wrote:
>>
>> ...
>> $ git checkout raster_tempdir
>> $ git rebase main
>>
>> Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/raster_tempdir.
>>
>> $ git status
>> On branch raster_tempdir
>> Your
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 2:30 PM Markus Metz
wrote:
>
> The commit history of the PR has not been messed up, only the relevant
> commits are shown.
>
Right, right, Git or GitHub recognizes that thoise 41 are already on main.
The reason for the rebase was that some tests were failing, apparently
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 8:46 PM Vaclav Petras wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 2:30 PM Markus Metz
wrote:
>>
>> The reason for the rebase was that some tests were failing, apparently
because of a combination of renaming master to main and changes to GHA, and
a PR can only be squashed and merged
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 4:36 PM Markus Metz
wrote:
>
> ...all the previously timed-out tests for the affected PRs are passed...
>
As for the timed-out tests - those which are running actual test suites and
time out after 6 hours - that's actually still an issue. It just usually
does not happen.
12 matches
Mail list logo
