Hi,
2008/9/1 Markus Neteler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> That's why GEM exists which should greatly simplify the compilation
> of addons. In general, I see a difference between "completely untested"
> and "lightly tested" (apart from "rigorously tested"). :)
it would be cool to improve GEM and integrat
I would like to test some of the GRASS addons for evaluation/inclusion
to main Grass code in (Mac and Ubuntu). I will probably use the
stable release as a test environment and of course North Carolina
dataset. Any specific test results I should submit?
This is the info I got from the wiki:
http:
Luigi Ponti wrote:
> I have a bash script that processes a text file consisting of longitude
> and latitude columns plus other columns with point data -- the script
> imports the data and maps it. The script includes a parser-friendly
> section so that the g.parser UI shows up if called with n
Hi there,
I have a bash script that processes a text file consisting of longitude
and latitude columns plus other columns with point data -- the script
imports the data and maps it. The script includes a parser-friendly
section so that the g.parser UI shows up if called with no arguments.
I
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Markus Metz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I understand the source code v.generalize discards all
> centroids and builds them anew at the end, area topology is not
> maintained during simplification.
Dear all,
That is correct. The intention was that the gene
Hi Peter,
as an interim solution you might try an alternative to v.generalize that
I called v.simplify, available here:
http://markus.metz.giswork.googlepages.com/line_simplification.tar.gz
The module works for me so far, but I still discover strange behaviour
now and then. I developed that module
thanks for the help,
maybe the solution will be useful: in "various Linux distributions are starting
to ship with a version of the GNU C compiler which incorporates an extension
which implements protection for stack-smashing". In that case the Makefile
has to modified with
CFLAGS = -fno-stack
Hi Silvia,
there have been a couple of fixes which probably didn't reach 6.3.0.
Could you try with 6.4.svn instead? There it will work.
Best
Markus
PS: See the list archives for older discussions on this.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Silvia Simoni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi grass-users
Hi to All,
Can anyone give me some suggestion about importing World Wind DTM to GRASS?
Thanks to all
Regards
Edmondo
___
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Paolo Cavallini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clément Calenge ha scritto:
>>
>>> Great news, and thanks a lot Clément!
>>> It would be good to have all this in the main GRASS code, rather than as
>>> addons: any objections on this?
>>
>> Personally, I have no objecti
Hi grass-users,
I'm trying to run a supervised reclassification for an orthophoto
created using r.in.gdal and r.composite.
Before running i.class, i run i.group to create a subgroup which is
required by i.class. [The group containing 3 files .red, .green, .blue
had been previously created d
Hi all,
Paul Kelly escribió:
I think I will delete the demo code from grass-addons shortly as the new
v.delaunay2 is now in grass-addons at
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass-addons/vector/v.delaunay2 and
ready for testing. Martin Pavlovsky, the SoC student working on this (Cc
to him i
Hi,
I second the "unclean deletion" theory as I encountered this phenomenon before.
Also, when generalizing areas which are attached to each other, while the
overall "appearance" of the generalized borderlines is ok, more than 50 % of
the areas cease to exist, which needs further investigation:
Hamish:
> > I had considered a few alternatives:
> >
> > - create a generic libxtf (LGPL?)
> > - GRASS support via a new C module (without a libxtf)
> > - postgis import tool
> > - sqlite import tool
> > - stand alone command line converter to csv or xml ascii format
> > (then shell script or py
Clément Calenge ha scritto:
>
>> Great news, and thanks a lot Clément!
>> It would be good to have all this in the main GRASS code, rather than as
>> addons: any objections on this?
>
> Personally, I have no objection on this.
The problem is that I sustpect very few people take the additional
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Paolo Cavallini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clément Calenge ha scritto:
>
>> I programmed three new add-ons for the GRASS software, and thanks to the
>> kind help of Markus Neteler, they are now available on the GRASS Addons
>> repository.
>
> Great news, and thanks
16 matches
Mail list logo