> On Jun 20, 2017, at 6:02 AM, Moritz Lennert
> wrote:
>
> You can try the addon: i.histo.match. You can install it with g.extension.
Hi Moritz,
Thanks for the suggestion. Currently the data is raster - I assume I will have
to convert it to imagery?
I tried installing the extension, but it
Sorry for the duplicate; I posted the other message after waiting over 6 hours
for this message to post (which ultimately took about 24 hours).
___
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
On 2017-06-20 at 08:45, Markus Metz wrote:
> Negative values in the drainage direction should only occur at the
> borders of the current region and around NULL cells. Note that if you
> want internal sinks to be drained, you must not use the depression
> option.
I was not using depression option
On 20/06/17 11:06, Jeshua Lacock wrote:
Greetings,
I am struggling to match histograms for various US states NAIP 1-meter
aerial photography.
It appears that each state shown here has been equalized for each
individual state except for Nevada and Arizona.
I have tried using r.rescale.eq with
Hi Ken,
To my knowledge r.watershed does not require to fill sinks in advance, because
it has a minimal impact routing for handling (non-real) sinks.
Do you have a particular reason for your wish to fill the DEM in advance?
Cheers
Stefan
-Original Message-
From: grass-user [mailto:gras
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Ken Mankoff wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-06-20 at 06:28, Markus Metz wrote:
> > You don't need to fill sinks with r.watershed, internal sinks are by
> > default drained.
>
> I have negative values in the drainage direction raster produced by
r.watershed in the interior.
On 2017-06-20 at 06:28, Markus Metz wrote:
> You don't need to fill sinks with r.watershed, internal sinks are by
> default drained.
I have negative values in the drainage direction raster produced by r.watershed
in the interior. Is this a bug? Or am I misunderstanding the definition of a
sink