Re: [grpc-io] java keep alive WARNING: Received GOAWAY with ENHANCE_YOUR_CALM

2017-06-05 Thread cr22rc
Seems to me that there should be an autoback off. Server warning don't call back again for 4 min . Well behaved clients follow that, bad ones get disconnected. On Monday, June 5, 2017 at 7:17:30 PM UTC-4, Eric Anderson wrote: > > In 1.3 we started allowing clients to be more aggressive. From

[grpc-io] Re: java keep alive WARNING: Received GOAWAY with ENHANCE_YOUR_CALM

2017-06-05 Thread cr22rc
Thanks makes sense. I was setting this to 1 sec at one time :) ... not production but just *playing* around and I think it was working without a hitch. However I think they upgraded the server grpc and now im getting this. If this is all that's going on no worries then. Like I said oddly wi

Re: [grpc-io] java keep alive WARNING: Received GOAWAY with ENHANCE_YOUR_CALM

2017-06-05 Thread 'Eric Anderson' via grpc.io
In 1.3 we started allowing clients to be more aggressive. From the 1.3 release notes: "Keepalives in Netty and OkHttp now allow sending pings without outstanding RPCs. The minimum keepalive time was also reduced from 1 minute to 10 seconds. Clients must get permission from the services they use be

[grpc-io] java keep alive WARNING: Received GOAWAY with ENHANCE_YOUR_CALM

2017-06-05 Thread cr22rc
Hi I set on a grpc stream with NettyChannel options: keepAliveTime"(60L, TimeUnit.SECONDS}); keepAliveTimeout{8L, TimeUnit.SECONDS}); At times in the code I've added sleep for 15 min. I see on Wireshark the keep alives. But after a time I see : ---

Re: [grpc-io] Re: gRFC A4: Header Extraction

2017-06-05 Thread 'Mark D. Roth' via grpc.io
It looks like we're going to be pursuing a different approach for this, in which the header field is set in the VTK layer based on static configuration. As a result, I am withdrawing this gRFC. Abhishek is driving forward the VTK proposal, so I presume that he will publish something once there ar