Hans Breuer writes:
> BTW: I'd appreciate if somebody with a deeper understanding of gtk internals
> could do a review of gtktrayicon-win32.c. Maybe what I've done is considered
> too much of a hack ;-)
I appreciate your work, but why the rush?
Isn't it better to wait some time and let the X11
On 18.09.2005 14:27, Hans Breuer wrote:
[...]
Before diving too deep into the code of (now) gtkstatusicon.c I've tried
it on Linux - but it does not work there, too. What am I supposed to
update so see any effect of ./teststatusicon ? (I'm running gnome-2.10.2
on gentoo with xorg-x11-6.8.2)
Tha
On 06.09.2005 15:08, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 23:25 +0200, Hans Breuer wrote:
[...]
Also gtkstatusicon-x11.c not only implements the fdo spec but it also
defines a bunch of status icon api. Not only 21 functions but additionally
quite some properties. Should all this be dupl
On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 11:34 +0100, Damon Chaplin wrote:
> I've had a look at all the composite children that Glade uses for GTK+
> widgets. I think all of these could have been avoided if the widgets had
> been written slightly differently:
>
> GladeChildOKButton;
> GladeChildCancelButton;
>
