2009/11/9 David Zeuthen :
> Hey Mikkel,
>
> Sorry for not replying sooner!
>
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 21:23 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
>> >> Attached is a series of patches (0001 should be identical to my
>> >> previous) implementing what you describe, except adding the gboolean
>> >> e
Hey Mikkel,
Sorry for not replying sooner!
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 21:23 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> >> Attached is a series of patches (0001 should be identical to my
> >> previous) implementing what you describe, except adding the gboolean
> >> enumerated arg to @introspect and @dis
2009/10/28 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen :
> 2009/10/28 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen :
>> 2009/10/27 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen :
>>> 2009/10/27 David Zeuthen :
Hey Mikkel,
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 23:52 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> > I just looked over the newly introduced
>>>
2009/10/28 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen :
> 2009/10/27 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen :
>> 2009/10/27 David Zeuthen :
>>> Hey Mikkel,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 23:52 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> I just looked over the newly introduced
> g_dbus_connection_register_subtree() and re
2009/10/27 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen :
> 2009/10/27 David Zeuthen :
>> Hey Mikkel,
>>
>> On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 23:52 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
>>> > I just looked over the newly introduced
>>> > g_dbus_connection_register_subtree() and related data structures, and
>>> > I think it wil
2009/10/27 David Zeuthen :
> Hey Mikkel,
>
> On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 23:52 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
>> > I just looked over the newly introduced
>> > g_dbus_connection_register_subtree() and related data structures, and
>> > I think it will fit very nicely with what I am going to need.
Hey Mikkel,
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 23:52 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> > I just looked over the newly introduced
> > g_dbus_connection_register_subtree() and related data structures, and
> > I think it will fit very nicely with what I am going to need. All in
> > all it looks really swe
2009/10/25 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen :
> 2009/10/15 David Zeuthen :
>> Hey Mikkel,
>>
>> On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:24 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
>>> * Can I register a GDBusInterfaceVTable without registering an
>>> object? The use case I have in mind is something akin to dynamically
>
2009/10/15 David Zeuthen :
> Hey Mikkel,
>
> On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:24 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
>> * Can I register a GDBusInterfaceVTable without registering an
>> object? The use case I have in mind is something akin to dynamically
>> spawning objects on the server side when mes
Hey Mikkel,
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 08:24 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> * Can I register a GDBusInterfaceVTable without registering an
> object? The use case I have in mind is something akin to dynamically
> spawning objects on the server side when messages are send to objects
> under a
2009/10/15 David Zeuthen :
>
> Hey,
> At the GNOME summit this weekend, Ryan Lortie, Matthias Clasen, Will
> Thompson and myself had a hallway conversation about how to get D-Bus
> functionality into the GLib stack. This mail is an attempt at
> summarizing what we talked about.
Thanks for this ext
11 matches
Mail list logo
