Hi,
There is GDL but I have no experience with it:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gdl/
It is what Anjuta uses.
Regards,
Florian Pelz
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
On 07/25/2016 10:19 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-07-23 at 16:25 -0400, Craig Cabrey wrote:
>> According to the docs [0], the "color-activated" signal is emitted
>> upon
>> the user making any changes to the current color.
>
> No -- read again. ("changes" are not mentioned)
>
> For ch
On 07/24/2016 08:26 AM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> On 07/24/2016 02:47 AM, Daniel Espinosa wrote:
>> Android and iOS have tools to do so available to the users, […]
>>
>
> […]
> I am not sure, but I believe this requirement can therefore be fulfilled
> by a)
only* using LGPLv2 libraries and
no LGPLv3, then I believe this is enough even if Digital Restrictions
Management prevents the user from actually replacing the *.so/*.dll
file, but IANAL.
Regards,
Florian Pelz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello,
I held a GTK+ workshop at the university I'm studying at (the
Kaiserslautern University of Technology). I want to share what I did in
case someone else is planning something similar. Since my workshop has
already happened, feedback will not be immediately useful to me, but
maybe I will offe
On 04/13/2016 11:45 PM, Daniel Espinosa wrote:
> But what about to promot a Standard Look &Feell, say in Freedesktop. It can
> suggest how graphical objects should look, no matter of toolkit?
I don't understand your proposal.
There are people who try to make Qt use GTK+ themes [1][2]. This is
pro
On 04/14/2016 07:31 AM, C Gosch wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I started using gtk3 (gtkmm-3.0) on OS X, coming from Linux.
> I installed everything using homebrew. I noticed that the windows of a very
> old test program that I wrote are having the wrong spacings between widgets
> and that
> some stock i
On 04/08/2016 10:37 AM, Fabio Pesari wrote:
> One of the accusations made against GNU/Linux is that there is no
> established "native" look-and-feel on it - GTK programs look different
> from Qt programs, JUCE programs look different from Qt programs, Tk
> programs and FLTK programs look different
On 04/11/2016 11:00 PM, Florian Pelz wrote:
> Yes, it is a bug. I can reproduce it. Downgrading GTK+ from 3.20.2 to
> 3.20.1 fixes the issue for me.
>
I just tried gtk3-git; the bug has already been fixed in the current git
version of GTK+. Still it was a good catch and well reported;
Yes, it is a bug. I can reproduce it. Downgrading GTK+ from 3.20.2 to
3.20.1 fixes the issue for me.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
For me, gtk_window_move doesn't work on Wayland. It works on X. I don't
know about Quartz/OSX. There are some bugs about gtk_window_move on
Bugzilla.
Are you running Wayland on Linux? Is it only window-position that does
not work or is gtk_window_move also broken for you?
That said, maybe there i
On 08/29/2015 11:49 AM, Jean-Marie Delapierre wrote:
> What I hope if the advantage of detecting more bugs at compilation time
> is agreed by the GTK+ community is that the union type declarations
> would be just included in the standard header files, allowing the
> programmers to use any coding st
On 08/29/2015 10:53 AM, LRN wrote:
> On 29.08.2015 11:46, Florian Pelz wrote:
>> On 08/29/2015 10:39 AM, Jean-Marie Delapierre wrote:
>>> I have explained (I hope in a clear way, but I begin to doubt about it)
>>> that the unions I suggest only own pointers, not chil
On 08/29/2015 10:39 AM, Jean-Marie Delapierre wrote:
> I have explained (I hope in a clear way, but I begin to doubt about it)
> that the unions I suggest only own pointers, not child objects as you
> say in your answer.
I think it is clear, but you still need to declare one such union for
each cl
On 08/28/2015 09:09 PM, Jean-Marie Delapierre wrote:
>> Hi;
>
>> this mailing list is probably not the one you want to use —
>> development of the GLib/GTK+ libraries is discussed on
>> gtk-devel-list gnome org
>
>> On 14 May 2015 at 10:27, Jean-Marie Delapierre
>> wrote:
>
>I have coded in
On 08/09/2015 05:42 PM, Igor Korot wrote:
> I just took a look at those links.
> Now nowhere in [1] and [2] I found an actual stats of how many people
> did/did not read the
> dialog messages prior to clicking the response button. There was
> absolutely _no statistics_.
> While [3] does show some s
On 05/16/2015 11:45 AM, John Tall wrote:
> This time however I'm building an application, so it will already have
> its own main routine. I can't link my unit tests to the application
> because that would give me two main routines, the main entry point of
> the application and the main entry point
Hi,
On 02/07/2015 08:09 AM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> You mean something like MathGL but for the GTK+/cairo stack ?
>
> I can't think of anything off hand which exists that does that, and
> I would see myself using it at one point or another.
>
> I would suggest that you do this with cairo dir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/20/2014 03:01 AM, Rafael Navega wrote:
> Hello. I'd like to know what's the simplest way to render raw
> OpenGL graphics onto a GTK widget, in a way that I can later
> overlay Cairo graphics on top of it. I would like this to be cross
> platform
Hi,
I'm a little confused about the state of OpenGL integration in GTK+. I
want to use a GTK+ 3 widget that allows me to draw using OpenGL in Vala.
How do I go about this?
* gtkglarea seems to provide this and supports GTK+ 3 since the latest
patch, but it does not have Vala or Introspect
Hi,
Someone asked this question on Stackoverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9747468/why-was-the-gobject-system-created
I think they answer it pretty well. Also, C is much closer to the
hardware and GCC's error messages for C++ are not that great.
On 08/07/2014 10:49 PM, Dub wrote:
t
n)
(Fatemeh Mehdizadeh)
3. Re: gtk error ( IA__gtk_widget_realize: assertion) (Florian
Pelz)
--
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 09:07:13 +0430
From: Fatemeh Mehdizadeh mailto:mehdizadeh.fate...@gmail.co
On 04/27/2014 06:40 AM, Fatemeh Mehdizadeh wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to say that my os is fedora 20 and java version is:
java version "1.7.0_45"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (fedora-2.4.3.0.fc20-x86_64 u45-b15)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.45-b08, mixed mode)
thanks again,
On Sun, Apr 27, 20
I open a bug report for this? Is parsing the
G_TOKEN_CHARs ":" and "=" the proper way to recognize a := operator?
Florian Pelz
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
24 matches
Mail list logo
