On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:37 AM, richard boaz wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Paul Davis
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 3:24 AM, richard boaz wrote:
>> > yep, i concur with the set sensitive method.
>>
>> all good, except that in an ideal world, the sensitivity changes are
>> a
On 17/09/10 22:01, Jeffrey Barish wrote:
> My application has one operation that runs for a long time (~1 minute).
> During this time, the user is not allowed to do anything. Nevertheless, I
> felt that it was important to give the user some feedback that the
> application is still alive and t
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 3:24 AM, richard boaz wrote:
> > yep, i concur with the set sensitive method.
>
> all good, except that in an ideal world, the sensitivity changes are
> applied to GtkAction's, not widgets. this way, keybindings and othe
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 3:24 AM, richard boaz wrote:
> yep, i concur with the set sensitive method.
> the way i do this is: when the user:
>
> executes something that gets done in the background,
> that requires some time,
> is non-interruptable,
> and must complete before any next user action
al
Very good. Your text should be IMHO added to library.gnome.org.
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 9:24 AM, richard boaz wrote:
> yep, i concur with the set sensitive method.
>
> the way i do this is: when the user:
>
>- executes something that gets done in the background,
>- that requires some tim
yep, i concur with the set sensitive method.
the way i do this is: when the user:
- executes something that gets done in the background,
- that requires some time,
- is non-interruptable,
- and must complete before any next user action
loop over a list of GtkWidget pointers i have sa
One option as already said is a modal dialog with progress bar, another
option is to have a progress bar in the main GUI and set the rest of the GUI
insensitive (you _really_ should familiarize yourself with
gtk_widget_set_sensitive() ).
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/GtkWidget.html#g
Lex Trotman wrote:
> On 18 September 2010 08:22, Jeffrey Barish
> wrote:
>> Jeffrey Barish wrote:
>>
>>> My application has one operation that runs for a long time (~1 minute).
>>> During this time, the user is not allowed to do anything. Nevertheless,
>>> I felt that it was important to give th
On 18 September 2010 08:22, Jeffrey Barish wrote:
> Jeffrey Barish wrote:
>
>> My application has one operation that runs for a long time (~1 minute).
>> During this time, the user is not allowed to do anything. Nevertheless, I
>> felt that it was important to give the user some feedback that the
Jeffrey Barish wrote:
> My application has one operation that runs for a long time (~1 minute).
> During this time, the user is not allowed to do anything. Nevertheless, I
> felt that it was important to give the user some feedback that the
> application is still alive and that the operation is r
My application has one operation that runs for a long time (~1 minute).
During this time, the user is not allowed to do anything. Nevertheless, I
felt that it was important to give the user some feedback that the
application is still alive and that the operation is running. My solution
was t
11 matches
Mail list logo
