On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
> 2) I get these errors in callbacks.c for routines like:
>
> void on_button_3_clicked(GtkButton *button, gpointer user_data)
>
> which I didn't write, but glade generated it for me.
One thing you could do -- which is Good Practice in any case -- is
* Manish Singh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 08:01:05PM -0700, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
> > I thank you for your reply, however it doesn't really answer my
> > question. First, I'm only using gcc, so Borland and MS C don't count.
> > Second, I'm obviouslly using gcc's -Wtra
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 20:01:05 PDT, "Carl B. Constantine" said:
> Second, I'm obviouslly using gcc's -Wtraditional setting for these
> errors to come up, so my question was: how do I get rid of these errors
> so that everything works correctly while still using -Wtraditional?
> Should I even be usin
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > What's "traditional C?" Is that K&R C, or the C formerly known as
> > c89, ANSI X3.159-1989? Then there is ISO C, ISO/IEC 9899:1990.
> > Then there is C99, ISO 9899:1999.
>
> Good question, I
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 08:01:05PM -0700, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
> I thank you for your reply, however it doesn't really answer my
> question. First, I'm only using gcc, so Borland and MS C don't count.
> Second, I'm obviouslly using gcc's -Wtraditional setting for these
> errors to come up, so
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 08:01:05PM -0700, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
> Should I even be using -Wtraditional?
I don't think so since Gtk+ itself requires an ISO C
compiler -- at least approximately -- to compile.
Yeti
--
Do not use tab characters. Their effect is not predictable.
___
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What's "traditional C?" Is that K&R C, or the C formerly known as
> c89, ANSI X3.159-1989? Then there is ISO C, ISO/IEC 9899:1990.
> Then there is C99, ISO 9899:1999.
Good question, I don't know. All I know is what I get in the warning.
> For t
What's "traditional C?" Is that K&R C, or the C formerly known as
c89, ANSI X3.159-1989? Then there is ISO C, ISO/IEC 9899:1990.
Then there is C99, ISO 9899:1999.
For the purposes of your question, I'd imagine you are refering to
ISO C as c99 and "traditional C" as c89. As K&R C does not sup
I'm getting alot of these in my code recently. Most likely due to the
update to gcc on my systems. I have two problems:
1) I get these errors in gutils.h which I didn't write. (using
glib2-2.4.0-1 in Fedora Core 2. I haven't tried with a newer version of
glib yet on my Debian box.
2) I get these
