Hi,
On Thu 08 Mar 2012 03:37, Mark H Weaver writes:
>> commit 24ea9f9c3abb8d9398df4810b815075593ba67c8
>> Author: Andy Wingo
>> Date: Tue Mar 6 22:21:39 2012 +0100
>>
>> ports.c: inline get_codepoint
>
> It's generally frowned upon nowadays to explicitly ask the C compiler to
> inline fun
Hi,
On Thu 08 Mar 2012 03:29, Mark H Weaver writes:
>> commit 283ab48d3f20a5c5281cafc29f0c30c8d8ace9ee
>> Author: Andy Wingo
>> Date: Wed Mar 7 19:01:56 2012 +0100
>>
>> faster (make-prompt-tag); default-prompt-tag is a parameter
>>
>> * module/ice-9/boot-9.scm (default-prompt-ta
Andy Wingo writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu 08 Mar 2012 03:37, Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>>> commit 24ea9f9c3abb8d9398df4810b815075593ba67c8
>>> Author: Andy Wingo
>>> Date: Tue Mar 6 22:21:39 2012 +0100
>>>
>>> ports.c: inline get_codepoint
>>
>> It's generally frowned upon nowadays to explicitly
Andy Wingo writes:
>> I fear that making 'default-prompt-tag' a parameter might slow things
>> down quite a bit on platforms with a slow implementation of thread local
>> storage.
>
> Not the case! It shouldn't depend on thread-local storage at all
> actually since the VM already has a handle on
On Thu 08 Mar 2012 15:28, Mark H Weaver writes:
>>> What's the anticipated use case for this?
>>
>> Parameterizing default prompts? It allows users to re-set the
>> user/system process boundary for a dynamic extent.
>
> Okay, makes sense. Sorry for the bother.
No problem. I don't have a deep