Hi all,
Now in corona times I'm working quite a lot with python-on-guile fixing
bugs in the parser and compiler. Trying to add and test more python
modules. My test case is to get IPython running on python on guile. Some of
the python library code is very advanced python so getting it working is a
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> Hi there,
>
> in my quest to get lilypond working with GUILE 2+, I've hit another
> stumbling block.
>
> In order to make compilation with GUILE 2+ working, we have to move
> away from runtime symbol definition (ie. module-define! calls).
>
> In the code below, it looks
On 3/22/20 12:07 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Hi there,
in my quest to get lilypond working with GUILE 2+, I've hit another
stumbling block.
In order to make compilation with GUILE 2+ working, we have to move
away from runtime symbol definition (ie. module-define! calls).
In the code below, it
Hi there,
in my quest to get lilypond working with GUILE 2+, I've hit another
stumbling block.
In order to make compilation with GUILE 2+ working, we have to move
away from runtime symbol definition (ie. module-define! calls).
In the code below, it looks like only one of the two definitions in
t