Hi,
To get guile-1.9.14 cross built for mingw, I re-updated gnulib
to include socket-related modules (starting with accept here)
gnulib-tool --import --dir=. --lib=libgnu --source-base=lib --m4-base=m4
--doc-base=doc --tests-base=tests --aux-dir=build-aux --libtool
--macro-prefix=gl --no-vc
Hi Jan,
Thanks for the report and patches!
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> To get guile-1.9.14 cross built for mingw, I re-updated gnulib
> to include socket-related modules (starting with accept here)
>
> gnulib-tool --import --dir=. --lib=libgnu --source-base=lib --m4-base=m4
> --doc-base=do
Ludovic Courtès schreef op za 29-01-2011 om 22:34 [+0100]:
Hi Ludovic,
> OK but all the modules listed after ‘accept’ above are needed too,
> right?
Yes, sure.
> Hmm could it be that there was a typo? Here running ‘git-version-gen’
> outside of a Git tree works fine:
>
> $ guile/build-aux/g
Hi Jan,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Ludovic Courtès schreef op za 29-01-2011 om 22:34 [+0100]:
[...]
>> Hmm could it be that there was a typo? Here running ‘git-version-gen’
>> outside of a Git tree works fine:
>>
>> $ guile/build-aux/git-version-gen .tarball-version s/foo/bar/
>> UNKNOW
Hi,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> gnulib-tool --import --dir=. --lib=libgnu --source-base=lib --m4-base=m4
> --doc-base=doc --tests-base=tests --aux-dir=build-aux --libtool
> --macro-prefix=gl --no-vc-files alignof alloca-opt announce-gen autobuild
> byteswap canonicalize-lgpl duplocale env
Ludovic Courtès schreef op ma 14-02-2011 om 13:29 [+0100]:
> Done.
Thanks!
> However, we don’t seem to be actually using the ‘sockets’ module: IIUC
> we should include “sockets.h” somewhere and call ‘gl_sockets_startup’,
> which we don’t do. Am I missing something?
It seems you're right, we do
Ludovic Courtès schreef op za 29-01-2011 om 22:34 [+0100]:
> > From 4aeb4bb48423d87001b598030afed0a2dc03e747 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
> > Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:42:46 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Use AC_CHECK_LIB rather than AC_LIB_HAVE_LINKFLAGS.
> > Fixes cros
Hi Jan,
Excuse the long quote here, but:
On Tue 15 Feb 2011 11:20, Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Ludovic Courtès schreef op za 29-01-2011 om 22:34 [+0100]:
>
>> > From 4aeb4bb48423d87001b598030afed0a2dc03e747 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
>> > Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:42
Andy Wingo schreef op di 22-02-2011 om 09:34 [+0100]:
Hi Andy,
> Excuse the long quote here
No problem.
> > I did, and Bruno Haible does not really care about this brokenness
> > or about cross compiling;
>
> That is a totally unfair characterization, Jan. You met him in the
> Hague and he di
Hi!
BTW I added cross-compilation jobs to Hydra (the ‘xbuild_*’ things):
http://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/gnu/guile-2-0/
The cross-MinGW one needs some love, but at least the cross-GNU one
works fine without special hacks.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Hi Jan,
Apologies for the delay in the reply.
On Thu 24 Feb 2011 10:39, Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Andy Wingo schreef op di 22-02-2011 om 09:34 [+0100]:
>
>> To be honest I don't find it too onerous to have to set these flags when
>> compiling with DESTDIR. Sure, it would be nicer if it were
Andy Wingo schreef op vr 04-03-2011 om 12:11 [+0100]:
Hi Andy,
[sorry for the long quote]
> Let's say you are building and installing Guile on Fedora. You download
> the tarball, ./configure && make && make install, and voila. You run
> Guile and it works. Sweet!
>
> So now you follow the ma
Hello,
* Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote on Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:08:20AM CET:
> It would be nicer still if looking in /usr at compile/build time could
> be turned off (from your use cases that seems to be possible), or
> be turned off for $DESTDIR builds. That could be done with a single
> flag. It w
Ralf Wildenhues schreef op zo 20-03-2011 om 09:21 [+0100]:
> Bruno already explained why it is not a good idea to let DESTDIR
> be the indicator of whether to look in /usr or not.
Ouch, I think I missed that. Does someone have a pointer?
Also, why look in /usr before looking in gcc's library sea
* Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote on Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:34:37AM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues schreef op zo 20-03-2011 om 09:21 [+0100]:
>
> > Bruno already explained why it is not a good idea to let DESTDIR
> > be the indicator of whether to look in /usr or not.
>
> Ouch, I think I missed that. Does some
15 matches
Mail list logo
