Re: [PATCH 0/2] New pinentries

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 05:49:09AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > Assuming no-one has any objections, this is my current patch set for > pinentry. > > $ ./pre-inst-env guix package -A pinentry > pinentry0.9.7 out gnu/packages/gnupg.scm:623:2 > pinentry-gtk2 0.9.7 out

Re: [PATCH] Update giac-xcas to 1.2.2-41

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 09:41:18PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 01:46:10PM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: giac-xcas: Update to 1.2.2-41. > > Hi, thank you for paying attention to this package and submitting a > patch! > > It looks reasonable, but

Re: [PATCH] Update giac-xcas to 1.2.2-41

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 01:46:10PM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: giac-xcas: Update to 1.2.2-41. Hi, thank you for paying attention to this package and submitting a patch! It looks reasonable, but for some reason I can't build giac-xcas, with or without it :( The tail of

volunteer needed to pickup my rust(.scm)

Appended / Inlined is the almost complete rust. I'm currently not in the position to finish my work on this, but I feel like this could be published soon. So if anyone wants to pick up my work, be my guest. It is not complete in syntax and style. It's also not good as it may contain unnecessary

Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] gnu: cross: Use CROSS_*_INCLUDE_PATH for system headers.

Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: >* any change made to cross-gcc / cross-libc triggers a rebuild of > both worlds this is not true, as Manolis pointed out on irc; I'm probably mistaking changes to ncurses or somesuch. > Because Guix uses pseudo cross-compilation in the bootstrap process >

Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] gnu: cross: Use CROSS_*_INCLUDE_PATH for system headers.

Andy Wingo writes: Hi! [Manolis: I've written a bit about the cross setup below, do you want to have a look?] > Mostly formatting nits, only a couple substantial comments. Looking > great. Oh that's super, thanks for all your help! It seems I have picked-up the convention of doing (if

Re: Proposal: Prefix language-name for language library packages

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 01:56:15PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hartmut Goebel skribis: > > > I propose to generalizing the specification [1,2] as we already have for > > Perl, Python and Java for most programming languages. In short: > > > > Package names should

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Red Eclipse.

Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-27 15:14 +0300) wrote: >>> + "Red Eclipse is an open-source arena shooter, created from the Cube2 > > s/open-source// Oops, I didn't notice this, thanks! >>> + ;; License information available in detail at the following link: >>> + ;;

Re: Call for screencasts!

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 05:49:08PM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote: It???s Sunday and you???re probably wondering what you could to help this wonderful project. Here???s an idea: make a screencast! :-) I???d like a video of at most 5 minutes to put on the home page that

Re: [PATCH] gnu: procps: Make procps build on non Linux systems.

Manolis Ragkousis skribis: > From 00c2d2ec11a75e3d74704150488e73ee7c8c6fe8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Manolis Ragkousis > Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:33:56 +0300 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: procps: Make procps build on non Linux systems. > > *

Re: Patch tracking

Ben Woodcroft skribis: > On 28/04/16 18:24, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: >> >>> As an experiment (it may disappear anytime), I generated the >>> ‘patches.json’ file for “patches”, so you can now run: >>> >>>guix package -i patches >>>

Re: Call for screencasts!

Alex Kost skribis: > Here is my attempt (50 seconds video). I think it is not worthy to > appear on the home page, but perhaps it will be interesting for someone. > > https://goblinrefuge.com/mediagoblin/u/alezost/m/emacs-interface-for-guix/ > > Direct link: >

Re: [PATCH] guix: use '@' in package-full-name instead of '-'

Mathieu Lirzin skribis: > Cyril Roelandt writes: > >> * guix/packages.scm (package-full-name): Use '@' instead of '-'. >> --- >> guix/packages.scm | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/guix/packages.scm b/guix/packages.scm

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Xft support to FLTK.

iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) skribis: > Kei Yamashita writes: > >> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 14:52:36 +0200 >> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: >> >>> Kei Yamashita skribis: >>> >>> > This patch is in preparation for the Dillo browser package. >>> >

Re: Proposal: Prefix language-name for language library packages

Hartmut Goebel skribis: > I propose to generalizing the specification [1,2] as we already have for > Perl, Python and Java for most programming languages. In short: > > Package names should be prefixed with the name of the language and if > the package name already

Re: Proposal: Prefix language-name for language library packages

Leo Famulari skribis: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 03:22:03PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I propose to generalizing the specification [1,2] as we already have for >> Perl, Python and Java for most programming languages. In short: >> >> Package names should be

[PATCH] Update giac-xcas to 1.2.2-41

Hello, Here follows a minor update to giac-xcas. Thank you for considering it for inclusion. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou0x80A93738 >From 11291cce0e4c79be708992cdf4f3e3263237c519 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Goaziou

Re: Patch tracking

On 28/04/16 18:24, Ludovic Courtès wrote: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: As an experiment (it may disappear anytime), I generated the ‘patches.json’ file for “patches”, so you can now run: guix package -i patches patches fetch https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/patches/patches.json

Re: [PATCH] gnu: procps: Make procps build on non Linux systems.

Can upstream be persauded to apply it? J' On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:30:09AM +0300, Manolis Ragkousis wrote: With this patch procps can be built on the Hurd. Manolis From 00c2d2ec11a75e3d74704150488e73ee7c8c6fe8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Manolis Ragkousis

Re: Call for screencasts!

Hi Alex, Alex Kost writes: > Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-17 18:49 +0300) wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> It’s Sunday and you’re probably wondering what you could to help this >> wonderful project. Here’s an idea: make a screencast! :-) >> >> I’d like a video of at most 5 minutes to put on the home page

Re: [PATCH] guix: use '@' in package-full-name instead of '-'

Cyril Roelandt (2016-04-28 05:25 +0300) wrote: > * guix/packages.scm (package-full-name): Use '@' instead of '-'. > --- > guix/packages.scm | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > diff --git a/guix/packages.scm b/guix/packages.scm > index d62d1f3..e33791e 100644 > ---

Re: Call for screencasts!

Ludovic Courtès (2016-04-17 18:49 +0300) wrote: > Hello! > > It’s Sunday and you’re probably wondering what you could to help this > wonderful project. Here’s an idea: make a screencast! :-) > > I’d like a video of at most 5 minutes to put on the home page that would > showcase, for example

[PATCH] gnu: procps: Make procps build on non Linux systems.

With this patch procps can be built on the Hurd. Manolis From 00c2d2ec11a75e3d74704150488e73ee7c8c6fe8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Manolis Ragkousis Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:33:56 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: procps: Make procps build on non Linux systems. *

Re: [PATCH] Add antiword.

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 08:19:38AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: Hi Guix, I???m not sure about the description, nor about the mention of ???Microsoft???. If you have better ideas for the description and synopsis please comment. The only thing I would change is to

Patch tracking

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > As an experiment (it may disappear anytime), I generated the > ‘patches.json’ file for “patches”, so you can now run: > > guix package -i patches > patches fetch https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/patches/patches.json > patches list status:committed

Re: [PATCH] guix: use '@' in package-full-name instead of '-'

Cyril Roelandt writes: > * guix/packages.scm (package-full-name): Use '@' instead of '-'. > --- > guix/packages.scm | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/guix/packages.scm b/guix/packages.scm > index d62d1f3..e33791e 100644 > ---

Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] gnu: cross: Use CROSS_*_INCLUDE_PATH for system headers.

Hi :) Mostly formatting nits, only a couple substantial comments. Looking great. On Wed 27 Apr 2016 21:27, Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > From d81bd3a288f3298d11983da6050958af99780dfe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen > Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016

Re: [PATCH] Add antiword.

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Hi Guix, > > I’m not sure about the description, nor about the mention of > “Microsoft”. If you have better ideas for the description and synopsis > please comment. > > ~~ Ricardo The last part (about where the name comes from) might not be strictly

Re: [PATCH] Upgrade ruby to 2.3.1 (including symlink patch)

Ben Woodcroft writes: > On 28/04/16 15:19, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> Rob Syme writes: >> >>> * gnu/packages/patches/ruby-symlinkfix.patch: New patch to fix issue #1448. >>> * gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby): Update to 2.3.1 including symlink patch. >> Thank

[PATCH] Add antiword.

Hi Guix, I’m not sure about the description, nor about the mention of “Microsoft”. If you have better ideas for the description and synopsis please comment. ~~ Ricardo >From a29993c7c079708aa0006a3af34b25bab99c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ricardo Wurmus Date: Thu,

Re: [PATCH] Upgrade ruby to 2.3.1 (including symlink patch)

I'm no expert, so please take as long as you need to look over this. I've attached a patch that includes the addition of the patch path to dist_patch_DATA. -r On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 at 13:26 Ben Woodcroft wrote: > > > On 28/04/16 15:19, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Rob Syme