Re: Supporting *multiple* bootloaders for arm64 on a single install?

2021-06-19 Thread Bengt Richter
Hi Stefan, et al, On +2021-06-19 17:11:45 +0200, Stefan wrote: > Hi! > > >> But as I understand it, guix only supports a single bootloader entry. > > > > That is correct. > > > >> To support all of the above, I would need three separate bootloader > >> instances... one for Pinebook, one for Pi

Re: Freezing ‘core-updates’ soon?

2021-06-19 Thread Chris Marusich
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello Guix! > > What about finally merging that ‘core-updates’ branch? :-) > > The main things to decide on are: > > • Upgrading to GCC 10? I know Marius has spent time looking at it and > fixing build failures caused by the upgrade. Can we do it? > > • Reduce

Re: Supporting *multiple* bootloaders for arm64 on a single install?

2021-06-19 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2021-06-19, Stefan wrote: >>> To support all of the above, I would need three separate bootloader >>> instances... one for Pinebook, one for Pinebook Pro, and lastly a >>> grub-efi bootloader. ... >> The chain bootloader itself is one Guix bootloader. >> >> I advise you to search for mails by S

Re: Supporting *multiple* bootloaders for arm64 on a single install?

2021-06-19 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2021-06-19, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > On Sun, 06 Jun 2021 14:38:27 -0700 > Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > >> So, I've managed to get a single image that supports booting both the >> Pinebook and Pinebook Pro reasonably well! I can pop the microSD card >> out of one and put it into the other, and

Re: Supporting *multiple* bootloaders for arm64 on a single install?

2021-06-19 Thread Stefan
Hi! >> But as I understand it, guix only supports a single bootloader entry. > > That is correct. > >> To support all of the above, I would need three separate bootloader >> instances... one for Pinebook, one for Pinebook Pro, and lastly a >> grub-efi bootloader. > > Stefan wrote a Guix chain

Re: Supporting *multiple* bootloaders for arm64 on a single install?

2021-06-19 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi Vagrant, On Sun, 06 Jun 2021 14:38:27 -0700 Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > So, I've managed to get a single image that supports booting both the > Pinebook and Pinebook Pro reasonably well! I can pop the microSD card > out of one and put it into the other, and it boots! Awesome! > The only prob

Re: Substitutes from bordeaux.guix.gnu.org

2021-06-19 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice 写道: I thought I could've just looked up the ASN :-) It is. Kind regards, T G-R signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Substitutes from bordeaux.guix.gnu.org

2021-06-19 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Christopher Baines 写道: Would trying to acquire a 2U rack mount server, and host it in a proper data centre be feasible? Because of both electricity usage and heat generation, it's going to be more difficult to host residentially I think. I thought Bayfront was hosted here[0], but we still pa

Re: Status of Qt build system patches on 'staging' branch.

2021-06-19 Thread Zhu Zihao
Leo Prikler writes: > It appears that back in the day they were reverted with > 918a099e7422fe8ad3464dc5a1b4f60843297742 before a staging merge on > February 1st. If nothing else happened on staging since, someone will > need to revert the revert or apply the patches themselves once more. These

Re: Status of Qt build system patches on 'staging' branch.

2021-06-19 Thread Leo Prikler
Am Samstag, den 19.06.2021, 13:59 +0800 schrieb Zhu Zihao: > Hello Guix! > > In January I'm following up a series of patches( > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/45784) that fixes Qt build > system to honor user's environment variable. It has been six months > now, > but these patches are still in 'stag