Alex Sassmannshausen skribis:
> I have tested Perl’s wrap phase, and that seems to work fine. I was
> unfortunately not able to test Python’s wrap phase, as I did not know of an
> appropriate test candidate (I tried to build offlineimap, but this failed
> because
Hi Ludo,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Alex Sassmannshausen skribis:
>
>>> You may try e.g. scons, pip, sphinx, or youtube-dl.
>>
>> Hartmut was kind enough to suggest the above python applications to test
>> this `wrap-language-programs` patch set
Hi Alex,
Alex Sassmannshausen skribis:
>> You may try e.g. scons, pip, sphinx, or youtube-dl.
>
> Hartmut was kind enough to suggest the above python applications to test
> this `wrap-language-programs` patch set against, however I have been
> stuck in "Rebuild
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:02:10AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
>> Leo Famulari writes:
>> > Changes like this will need to go on the core-updates branch, where we
>> > make changes to the core of the system.
>>
>> Makes sense, I will push it to core-updates
Am 17.11.2016 um 22:15 schrieb Leo Famulari:
> So, changing the build systems for these languages will require you to
> rebuild almost everything.
We now have thee build-systems which are changed: python (branch
python-build-system), cmake (branch staging, a simple change only) and perl.
What
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:02:10AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
> > Changes like this will need to go on the core-updates branch, where we
> > make changes to the core of the system.
>
> Makes sense, I will push it to core-updates tonight.
To clarify, I didn't read
Hi Leo,
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:58:45PM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> > You may try e.g. scons, pip, sphinx, or youtube-dl.
>>
>> Hartmut was kind enough to suggest the above python applications to test
>> this `wrap-language-programs` patch
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:58:45PM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> > You may try e.g. scons, pip, sphinx, or youtube-dl.
>
> Hartmut was kind enough to suggest the above python applications to test
> this `wrap-language-programs` patch set against, however I have been
> stuck
Am 17.11.2016 um 18:09 schrieb Alex Sassmannshausen:
> In both cases, the programs work fine with the generalized patch.
Fine :-)
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are
Fwiw, I have now succeeded at building offlineimap, and as a result, it
seems youtube-dl also was able to be built easily (presumably because
they share a great number of dependencies).
In both cases, the programs work fine with the generalized patch.
Alex
Alex Sassmannshausen writes:
> Hello
Hello
> You may try e.g. scons, pip, sphinx, or youtube-dl.
Hartmut was kind enough to suggest the above python applications to test
this `wrap-language-programs` patch set against, however I have been
stuck in "Rebuild the world"-hell for the last day and a half setting up
testcases.
I end up
Hello,
Following on from discussion earlier in the week, please find attached 3
patches that implement a generalized `wrap-language-programs` procedure that
can be used to add a `wrap` phase to build-systems.
The first patch adds the procedure, and the following 2 patches add `wrap`
phase
12 matches
Mail list logo