Kete skribis:
> On Saturday, January 04, 2014 08:15:40 AM John Darrington wrote:
>> The example in bash.scm is over complicated. Look at some of the examples
>> in xorg.scm to see how to set configure-flags.
>
> That got me a little further.
> Src/../Src/mkmakemod.sh: line 467: /bin/sh: No
Kete skribis:
> On Saturday, January 04, 2014 12:47:06 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> I’d recommend looking at how that tcsetpgrp check is implemented, to see
>> what makes it think it doesn’t work. In particular what does
>> ‘config.log’ report about this test?
>
> I didn't find any mention.
Hmm
This is where you have to start doing some detective work and probably some
patching!
Based on what you pasted, it looks as if CONFIG_SHELL isn't getting passed to
the mkmakemod.sh file.
Probably the zsh devs have done something wierd.
What I do at this stage is to build with the -K flag, then
On Saturday, January 04, 2014 12:47:06 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I’d recommend looking at how that tcsetpgrp check is implemented, to see
> what makes it think it doesn’t work. In particular what does
> ‘config.log’ report about this test?
I didn't find any mention.
> The ‘license’ field shou
On Saturday, January 04, 2014 08:15:40 AM John Darrington wrote:
> The example in bash.scm is over complicated. Look at some of the examples
> in xorg.scm to see how to set configure-flags.
That got me a little further.
Src/../Src/mkmakemod.sh: line 467: /bin/sh: No such file or directory
Kete skribis:
> Thanks, that did help, but I got the following error:
> checking if tcsetpgrp() actually works... notty
> configure: error: no controlling tty
> Try running configure with --with-tcsetpgrp or --without-tcsetpgrp
Ah, that’s an issue with the ‘configure’ script of
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 08:10:56PM -0500, Kete wrote:
On Friday, January 03, 2014 04:19:26 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> It is called ‘x11’ (to avoid ambiguity with other licenses originating
> from MIT) in the (guix licenses) module. So you would write
>
>(define-modul
On Friday, January 03, 2014 04:19:26 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> It is called ‘x11’ (to avoid ambiguity with other licenses originating
> from MIT) in the (guix licenses) module. So you would write
>
>(define-module (gnu packages zsh)
> ...
>(license (x11-style "http://url-of/th
Kete skribis:
> On Friday, January 03, 2014 06:50:40 AM John Darrington wrote:
>> This would suggest that you haven't got a guix daemon running.
>>
>> Install guix and set up the daemon as described in Chapter 2 of the GUIX
>> manual.
>
> Thanks, here are the results:
>
> gnu/packages/zsh.
> Thanks, here are the results:
>
> gnu/packages/zsh.scm:12:2: warning: possibly unbound variable `mit'
>
> The license is like MIT.
>
> guix build: error: zsh: unknown package
I guess it would be easier to help if you provide the code.
pgpy4oI5TndsZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday, January 03, 2014 06:50:40 AM John Darrington wrote:
> This would suggest that you haven't got a guix daemon running.
>
> Install guix and set up the daemon as described in Chapter 2 of the GUIX
> manual.
Thanks, here are the results:
gnu/packages/zsh.scm:12:2: warning: possibl
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 09:28:24PM -0500, Kete wrote:
On Thursday, January 02, 2014 06:44:00 AM Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
> $ git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/guix.git
> $ cd guix
> $ ./bootstrap && ./configure --localstatedir=/nix/var && make && make
check
>
> (See ‘HA
On Thursday, January 02, 2014 06:44:00 AM Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
> $ git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/guix.git
> $ cd guix
> $ ./bootstrap && ./configure --localstatedir=/nix/var && make && make check
>
> (See ‘HACKING’ for more information.)
>
> Then you could add a recipe (i.e., the definition
On Thursday, January 02, 2014 06:58:47 PM Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
> Hm, I’m a bit puzzled. How did you change ‘gnu-system.am’, then?
gnu-system.am was at the top level. I didn't have a packages folder in my gnu
dir.
> Did you clone the repository or download the tarball? If not, could you
> p
On Thursday, January 02, 2014 06:50:25 AM Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
> > make[2]: *** No rule to make target `gnu/packages/zsh.scm', needed by
> > `all-
> > am'. Stop.
>
> Sorry, I totally misunderstood the context. Are you trying to add Zsh?
>
> It seems you added a line to ‘gnu-system.am’ but f
> Yes, I don't know where 'gnu/packages' is except for savannah.
Hm, I’m a bit puzzled. How did you change ‘gnu-system.am’, then?
‘gnu/packages’ should be in the same directory (on your machine) as
‘gnu-system.am’.
Did you clone the repository or download the tarball? If not, could you
please f
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target `gnu/packages/zsh.scm', needed by `all-
> am'. Stop.
Sorry, I totally misunderstood the context. Are you trying to add Zsh?
It seems you added a line to ‘gnu-system.am’ but forgot to add a file to
‘gnu/packages’. Could you confirm?
pgphZ6mz0EGJx.pgp
Desc
> Am I supposed to add a module to gnu-system.am?
Yes, here’s an example [1].
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target `gnu/packages/zsh.scm', needed by `all-
> am'. Stop.
I’ve just tried the following. Could you do the same and report any
issues?
$ git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/guix.git
$ cd g
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `gnu/packages/zsh.scm', needed by `all-
am'. Stop.
On Wednesday, January 01, 2014 08:55:07 PM John Darrington wrote:
> the
> pre-inst-env file should exist in your build directory (after you have built
> guix of course)
If I finish this process, maybe somebody could use the instructions.
The location of pre-inst-env was one of my earlier questio
Are you working from Git or from a released tarball? Either way, the
pre-inst-env file should exist in your build directory (after you have built
guix
of course)
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 02:13:42PM -0500, Kete wrote:
On Wednesday, January 01, 2014 05:50:05 PM John Darrington wrote:
>
On Wednesday, January 01, 2014 05:50:05 PM John Darrington wrote:
> make && ./pre-inst-env guix build
"no such file or directory: ./pre-inst-env"
So I need this: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/pre-inst-env.in?
can't cd to @abs_top_srcdir@
or @abs_top_builddir@
ERROR: no code for
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 11:32:35AM -0500, Kete wrote:
On Wednesday, January 01, 2014 05:09:18 PM John Darrington wrote:
> When it's ready rpPost a patch to the list. Ludovic will commit it to
the
> repository (if he likes it).
This is my problem. How do I know if it work
On Wednesday, January 01, 2014 05:09:18 PM John Darrington wrote:
> When it's ready rpPost a patch to the list. Ludovic will commit it to the
> repository (if he likes it).
This is my problem. How do I know if it works if I can't test it by building
the package?
Thanks
On Wednesday, January 01, 2014 01:52:35 PM you wrote:
> The .scm file usually stays in the directory gnu/packages/
If you mean http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/, then
how do I contribute to the project?
> "guix download" is a convenience function for package developers
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 07:37:26PM -0500, Kete wrote:
> make && ./pre-inst-env guix build
Thanks, what do you do with the scm (Scheme) package definition file? Does
it
play a part in that? Do we place it in the current directory?
The .scm file usually stays in the director
On Monday, December 30, 2013 08:16:01 AM John Darrington wrote:
> Package definitions reside in gnu/package/*.scm The packages themselves,
> once built, get automatically put into /nix/store.
>
Sorry, I always forget to 'Reply all'. I hope you don't mind if I take this
back public.
On Monday, D
I'm not sure that I understand the question correctly.
Package definitions reside in gnu/package/*.scm The packages themselves, once
built, get automatically put into /nix/store.
J'
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:55:59PM -0500, Kete wrote:
Where does a package definition go to build a local
Where does a package definition go to build a local package with Guix:
/nix/store?
29 matches
Mail list logo
