Christopher Baines writes:
[[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
Hey!
After substitute availability taking a bit of a dive recently,
the
bordeaux build farm has finally caught back up and QA is back
submitting
builds for packages changed by patches.
QA also has a feature to allow easily tagging
Am Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 04:08:45PM +0100 schrieb Tanguy LE CARROUR:
> I’m "reviewing" `[bug#68997] gnu: lightning: Update to 2.2.3`… please
> find another one!
Now that you jump to complicated and not even yet built by QA packages,
you are safe from my competition :)
Andreas
Vivien Kraus writes:
> Hello Chris,
>
> Le vendredi 09 février 2024 à 10:44 +, Christopher Baines a écrit :
>> Let me know if you have any comments or questions!
>
> Thank you for all your work on QA.
>
> I can’t help but notice QA is missing a few patches. For instance,
>
Vivien Kraus writes:
> Dear QA wizards,
>
> Le vendredi 09 février 2024 à 10:44 +, Christopher Baines a écrit :
>> You just need to not be involved (so you can't review your
>> own patches)
>
> I interpret this as it’s OK to review patches if you asked for a change
> in the thread, am I
Hello Chris,
Le vendredi 09 février 2024 à 10:44 +, Christopher Baines a écrit :
> Let me know if you have any comments or questions!
Thank you for all your work on QA.
I can’t help but notice QA is missing a few patches. For instance,
issues.guix.gnu.org lists 7 open issues with patches
Dear QA wizards,
Le vendredi 09 février 2024 à 10:44 +, Christopher Baines a écrit :
> You just need to not be involved (so you can't review your
> own patches)
I interpret this as it’s OK to review patches if you asked for a change
in the thread, am I correct? Or is this too much
Andreas Enge writes:
> I see a few "Failed to process revision", for instance here:
>https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/68778
> While I am not sure why, these look like transient (?) build failures,
> at least failures not related to the patch in question. What is there to do?
Long term it
Quoting Andreas Enge (2024-02-09 15:30:44)
> Am Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 02:53:59PM +0100 schrieb Tanguy LE CARROUR:
> > Quoting Christopher Baines (2024-02-09 14:44:25)
> > > Tanguy LE CARROUR writes:
> > > > Can I safely close it?!
> > >
> > > Yep, this unfortunately looks like a case where there
Hello,
I see a few "Failed to process revision", for instance here:
https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/68778
While I am not sure why, these look like transient (?) build failures,
at least failures not related to the patch in question. What is there to do?
Andreas
Am Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 02:53:59PM +0100 schrieb Tanguy LE CARROUR:
> Quoting Christopher Baines (2024-02-09 14:44:25)
> > Tanguy LE CARROUR writes:
> > > Can I safely close it?!
> >
> > Yep, this unfortunately looks like a case where there was a duplication
> > of effort and the original patch
Quoting Christopher Baines (2024-02-09 14:44:25)
> Tanguy LE CARROUR writes:
> > Can I safely close it?!
>
> Yep, this unfortunately looks like a case where there was a duplication
> of effort and the original patch got ignored.
>
> It looks like the issue has been closed now.
Not me!
Tanguy LE CARROUR writes:
> Hi Chris,
>
> First of, thanks (again) for everything that you’ve done with QA!
> It looks great!
>
>
> Quoting Christopher Baines (2024-02-09 11:44:11)
>> Let me know if you have any comments or questions!
>
> Unfortunately, I have some (stupid) questions!
>
> I
Hi Chris,
First of, thanks (again) for everything that you’ve done with QA!
It looks great!
Quoting Christopher Baines (2024-02-09 11:44:11)
> Let me know if you have any comments or questions!
Unfortunately, I have some (stupid) questions!
I decided to give it a try and I picked at random a
On Fri, Feb 09 2024, Christopher Baines wrote:
> After substitute availability taking a bit of a dive recently, the
> bordeaux build farm has finally caught back up and QA is back submitting
> builds for packages changed by patches.
>
> QA also has a feature to allow easily tagging patches
Hey!
After substitute availability taking a bit of a dive recently, the
bordeaux build farm has finally caught back up and QA is back submitting
builds for packages changed by patches.
QA also has a feature to allow easily tagging patches (issues) as having
been reviewed and ready to merge
15 matches
Mail list logo
