On 30-08-2022 11:27, muradm wrote:
IIUC, everything using basu also works fine with elogind (*), so the
'status quo' of still using elogind (for old and new) seems harmless
to me (except for size -- basu is smaller).
I don't find the "everything using basu also works fine with elogind"
Maxime Devos writes:
[[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
On 30-08-2022 09:59, muradm wrote:
Hello,
basu is sd-bus library extracted from systemd.
Currently, there are two packages depending on it,
which are mako and grimshot.
In https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=56859,
I suggest
(**) This is just a guess about what your goal was, maybe you had a
different reason in mind. E.g., basu seems to be more active than
elogind.
Oops I misread the dates -- the latest commit in basu was before the
latest commit in elogind.
OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc
Description: OpenPGP
On 30-08-2022 09:59, muradm wrote:
Hello,
basu is sd-bus library extracted from systemd.
Currently, there are two packages depending on it,
which are mako and grimshot.
In https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=56859,
I suggest switching xdg-desktop-portal-wlr to basu.
In very same
Hello,
basu is sd-bus library extracted from systemd.
Currently, there are two packages depending on it,
which are mako and grimshot.
In https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=56859,
I suggest switching xdg-desktop-portal-wlr to basu.
In very same issue, Maxime asks to discuss
