On Wednesday 18 March 2009 23:08:30 Alan Bell wrote:
this bit is the speed rating:
PC2-6400
PC2-5300
and the 6400 one is faster. If your computer doesn't support PC2-6400 it
should just operate at 5300 speeds. In fact the 800 and the 667 is the
speed in Mhz I think.
Not always true
What are the relative advantages and disadvantages of two pairs of sticks
given that they both cost the same?
Basically, why one might prefer:
CT2KIT12864AA667 • DDR2 PC2-5300 • CL=5 • Unbuffered • NON-ECC • DDR2-667 •
1.8V • 128Meg x 64
to:
CT2KIT12864AA800 • DDR2 PC2-6400 • CL=6 •
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 20:42:03 + (+), Lisi wrote:
What are the relative advantages and disadvantages of two pairs of sticks
given that they both cost the same?
Basically, why one might prefer:
CT2KIT12864AA667 • DDR2 PC2-5300 • CL=5 • Unbuffered • NON-ECC • DDR2-667 •
1.8V •
this bit is the speed rating:
PC2-6400
PC2-5300
and the 6400 one is faster. If your computer doesn't support PC2-6400 it should
just operate at 5300 speeds. In fact the 800 and the 667 is the speed in Mhz I
think.
Alan.
Lisi wrote:
What are the relative advantages and disadvantages of two
