Cómo desarrollar y mantener clientes clave para siempre

Administración de Cuentas ClaveBogotá 27 y 28 de Noviembre de 2013Aprenda las técnicas y herramientas que hacen y fortalecen una relación fructífera y duradera. ¿Sabe cuánto de las utilidades de su empresa provienen de sólo unos cuantos de sus mejores clientes? Enfocarse en estas cuentas es

Re: [PATCH v2] Add ability to select HASH function amongst (SDBM/DJB2/WT6) and optionally apply avalanche

Hello, I filled in the test result for the remaining cases. It is the same link as before [1]. The tests were executed with 3 data sets as follows (a) 10K requests (includes duplicate host headers) (b) All unique host headers in 1M requests (c) and 250K requests (includes duplicate hosts headers

HAProxy and SSL through and through

I was happily using HAProxy, until I received word that we need to also encrypt traffic to the web servers. So, internet --https--> load balancer --https--> web servers. Can I still do this with HAProxy? We don't need any Layer 7 rules. If so, what would the config look like? We do need the fo

требуете осязать мир точно?

Ваша жизнь будет симпатичнее. Ваша жизнь случится насыщеней и любопытней. Вы по-видимому и не подозревали. http://goo.gl/g8Oa9J

RE: set weight bug?

Hi! > Here is my config http://pastie.org/private/wf0dv30krqpasgmhtdnahw > (Deleted some servers and two backends for clear config) > > I used script to handle servers weight since haproxy-ss-20131031, so I > never tried previous versions. Sorry, still can't reproduce. For problem 1 (after set

stats: mismatched weight output

Hi! While trying to reproduce Igor's problem, I noticed some strange behavior in the stats output: A server has an initial weight of 100, and unix socket, html and csv outputs match. But when I modify the weight (in this case, I set it again to 100), then the unix socket shows the correct weight

Does haproxy in transparent mode support FreeBSD's divert mechanism ?

Hi, All: In the past day, I want use pf’s “reply-to” on freebsd to solve ip address overlapping problem. But it’s seems that pf’s “divert-to” and “divert-reply” cannot work with haproxy on the same machine. Does haproxy in transparent mode support FreeBSD’s divert mechanism ? Regards Si

Does haproxy in transparent mode support FreeBSD's divert mechanism ?

Hi, All: In the past day, I want use pf’s “reply-to” on freebsd to solve ip address overlapping problem. But it’s seems that pf’s “divert-to” and “divert-reply” cannot work with haproxy on the same machine. Does haproxy in transparent mode support FreeBSD’s divert mechanism ? Regards Sim