❦ 16 mars 2020 16:02 -06, Sean Reifschneider:
> I reverted back to haproxy 2.0.13 from the PPA last Wednesday and have
> verified that we get no segfaults on that. If there's anything else I can
> provide for you, let me know. Otherwise I'm just gonna close this ticket
> in our bugtracker.
I reverted back to haproxy 2.0.13 from the PPA last Wednesday and have
verified that we get no segfaults on that. If there's anything else I can
provide for you, let me know. Otherwise I'm just gonna close this ticket
in our bugtracker. :-)
Sean
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 10:53 AM Sean
Hi,
My name is Stefan and I represent TheVPNShop.com who specialise in VPN
comparison and reviews. We are hoping to change the way people shop and buy
VPNs in a market that is currently only suited to the review sites who get
paid to list VPNs in a certain order.
Anyway, we are writing an
oops :)
Comment #4 on issue 323 by david...@chromium.org: boringssl fails on
travis-ci/clang-9
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/boringssl/issues/detail?id=323#c4
Looks like the issue is you've managed to convince it that your C compiler
is Clang and your C++ compiler is GCC.
-- The C compiler
Le 13/03/2020 à 07:54, Kevin Zhu a écrit :
Hi
The agent's engine_id forgot to dup from trash, all engine_ids point to the same
address "", the engine_id changed at run time and will double-free
when release agents and trash.
Kevin
Thanks, now applied !
--
Christopher Faulet
пн, 16 мар. 2020 г. в 14:54, Willy Tarreau :
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:49:26AM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > Ilya,
> >
> > Am 16.03.20 um 07:52 schrieb ???:
> > > we use clang because of its address sanitizer. I found gcc asan more
> noisy
> > > and less usable.
> >
> > I believe
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:49:26AM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Ilya,
>
> Am 16.03.20 um 07:52 schrieb ???:
> > we use clang because of its address sanitizer. I found gcc asan more noisy
> > and less usable.
>
> I believe you broke ASAN with clang-9 anyway, because the Travis
>
Ilya,
Am 16.03.20 um 07:52 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> we use clang because of its address sanitizer. I found gcc asan more noisy
> and less usable.
I believe you broke ASAN with clang-9 anyway, because the Travis
configuration checks for 'clang':
пн, 16 мар. 2020 г. в 13:40, Willy Tarreau :
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:51:20PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > From 5d5891166389dc03ab4fb63ca9edaa35feca8fcc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Ilya Shipitsin
> > Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:49:34 +0500
> > Subject: [PATCH] CI: switch BoringSSL
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:51:20PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> From 5d5891166389dc03ab4fb63ca9edaa35feca8fcc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ilya Shipitsin
> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:49:34 +0500
> Subject: [PATCH] CI: switch BoringSSL back to clang-7
>
> it turned out that BoringSSL is not
пн, 16 мар. 2020 г. в 12:09, Willy Tarreau :
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:52:27AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > ??, 16 ???. 2020 ?. ? 11:35, Willy Tarreau :
> >
> > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 10:54:56PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > > ??, 14 ???. 2020 ?. ? 14:23, Willy Tarreau :
> > > >
> > >
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:52:27AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> ??, 16 ???. 2020 ?. ? 11:35, Willy Tarreau :
>
> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 10:54:56PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > ??, 14 ???. 2020 ?. ? 14:23, Willy Tarreau :
> > >
> > > > Hi Ilya,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at
пн, 16 мар. 2020 г. в 11:35, Willy Tarreau :
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 10:54:56PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > ??, 14 ???. 2020 ?. ? 14:23, Willy Tarreau :
> >
> > > Hi Ilya,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:46:45AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > let us use
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 10:54:56PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> ??, 14 ???. 2020 ?. ? 14:23, Willy Tarreau :
>
> > Hi Ilya,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:46:45AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > let us use clang-9 instead of default clang-7 for linux builds.
> >
> > It
14 matches
Mail list logo
