Re: Clarification for ARM support

2020-03-09 Thread Emilio Fernandes
El lun., 9 mar. 2020 a las 15:52, Willy Tarreau () escribió: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 03:41:19PM +0200, Emilio Fernandes wrote: > > > I guess this was written before arm64 was really a thing, but both > 32bits > > > and 64bits arm are actively supported. > > > > > > > This is great to hear! > > C

Re: Clarification for ARM support

2020-03-09 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 03:41:19PM +0200, Emilio Fernandes wrote: > > I guess this was written before arm64 was really a thing, but both 32bits > > and 64bits arm are actively supported. > > > > This is great to hear! > Could you please update the website to mention this ? It would make > managers

Re: Clarification for ARM support

2020-03-09 Thread Emilio Fernandes
Hi Olivier, El lun., 9 mar. 2020 a las 12:58, Olivier Houchard () escribió: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:33:55AM +0200, Emilio Fernandes wrote: > > Hello HAProxy team, > > > > At https://www.haproxy.org/#plat I see that ARM architecture is > supported > > for Linux with newer kernel. > >

Re: Clarification for ARM support

2020-03-09 Thread Olivier Houchard
Hi, On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:33:55AM +0200, Emilio Fernandes wrote: > Hello HAProxy team, > > At https://www.haproxy.org/#plat I see that ARM architecture is supported > for Linux with newer kernel. > To avoid confusion could you please add next to it whether it is only 32 > bit, 64 bit or both

Clarification for ARM support

2020-03-09 Thread Emilio Fernandes
Hello HAProxy team, At https://www.haproxy.org/#plat I see that ARM architecture is supported for Linux with newer kernel. To avoid confusion could you please add next to it whether it is only 32 bit, 64 bit or both ? Just like "x86, x86_64" before that. Recently we started testing on ARM64 and s