Still catching up with messages...
Greg, as I am the only person on this list who makes money off GT.M
(since GT.M revenue ultimately pays my salary), it would seem that the
only person who can make a sales pitch for GT.M is me.
Right now, it is hard for me to understand which postings you are
re
This is not a GT.M list (nor is it a Cache list or MUMPS V1 list). I
appreciate that a significant number of list members happen to use
GT.M, so it is natural that a GT.M specific questions or threads of
discussion will be common on the list. What does make me uncomfortable
is postings that have th
IANAL (I am not a lawyer), but forbidding links to copyrighted
material would pretty much rule out linking to ANYTHING. I would say
the answer is generally no, and that hyperlinks should, in most
cases, be treated as references (e.g., in footnotes or endnotes).
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL P
Good question. Generally speaking job announcements posted to lists
not specifically intended for that purpose are considered spam. I
don't know that this is what Greg K. had in mind, it's a matter for
us to discuss.
For what it's worth, it is common practice to have separate mailing
list
8. DO NOT spam the list with your advertising message. You will be banned
from the list if you do so.
If a company has a position open for a VistA knowledgeable person, is
placing a job announcement considered SPAM?
12. Do not forward copyrighted material or information you do not have
permissi
Is your browser encoding the "_" in "mailing_list"?
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"A hero is no braver than an ordinary
man, but he is brave five minutes longer."
-- Ralph Waldo Emerson
On Aug 21, 2005, at 4:11 AM, smcphelan wrote:
I got the same results as Kevin, I could not get t
Today the linked worked without any changes to the browser. I do not know
why it did not work the other day.
- Original Message -
From: "Gregory Woodhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-
sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Hardhats-members] Rules for the List
>
> We have quantified rules for the list that members are to observe in
> order to keep this list a productive and orderly place to explore and
> learn about the technical aspects of VistA (i.e. the infrastructure).
&g
I got the same results as Kevin, I could not get to the page.
- Original Message -
From: "Thurman Pedigo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 2:29 PM
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] Rules for the List
> I checked - short, succinct, and useful.
I checked - short, succinct, and useful.
I wouldn't mind seeing it posted to this list monthly.
thurman
>
> I tried the link above twice, and got a bad link error.
>
> Kevin
>
> On 8/20/05, Greg Kreis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We have quantified rules for the list that members are to ob
I tried the link above twice, and got a bad link error.
But I'm sure it says something like, stay on track and no flame wars.
The shoe fits me, so I'll try to wear it.
Kevin
On 8/20/05, Greg Kreis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have quantified rules for the list that members are to observe in
We have quantified rules for the list that members are to observe in
order to keep this list a productive and orderly place to explore and
learn about the technical aspects of VistA (i.e. the infrastructure).
Please review them.
http://www.hardhats.org/mailing_list.html#RULES
--
Greg Kreis
12 matches
Mail list logo