http://www.modernphysician.com/news.cms?newsId=2931
To bad the DOD just didn't put in VistA years ago. Looks like now they will
be scanning in their records. It's saddening.
--
Nancy Anthracite
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product
I just made two mistakes. This is the first one. Walter Reed does use CHCS
I. A big bird just told me.
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 12:54 pm, Nancy E. Anthracite wrote:
> http://www.modernphysician.com/news.cms?newsId=2931
>
> To bad the DOD just didn't put in VistA years ago. Looks like no
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Tom Munnecke wrote:
Tom:
Your comment with respect to the VA is not limited to the VA, nor to
healthcare. The attitudinal mindset has resulted in the "Decade of Denial
followed by the current Decade of Refusal" to address most key problems.
Nevertheless, those (in Hardhats,
Arden,
I think more than a "forum" for dialog is necessary... for VA and DoD
to share anything would involve someone losing some bureaucratic turf.
Unfortunately, this protection-of-turf instinct is more important
than cost savings, patient safety, effectiveness of systems, or even
the mission of
Nancy and hardhats:
As many hardhats know DoD developed CHCS from VistA in the late 1980s;
SAIC was the contractor. There is much commonality in the architectures of
the two systems but there has been relatively little cross dialog about
the common conceptual content of the two architectures. In
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardhats-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A. Forrey
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 1:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Walter Reeds Records to be Digitalized for
> $3.7 million
>
> Nancy and hardhats:
> As many h
list I see repeated evidence that the process persists.
...sigh
Regards,
Richard.
> From: Tom Munnecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:32:09 -0800
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Walter Reeds Rec
