Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: HNOP 0.1

2006-06-30 Thread Andres Loeh
> Could you perhaps write a Haskell Weekly News entry for this? It might > also be worth contacting Andres Löh and seeing if we can get a late > entry into the Haskell Communities and Activities Report, this seems > critical enough. I agree that it is pretty critical, but I'll rather do a HNOP thi

Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: HNOP 0.1

2006-06-30 Thread David House
On 30/06/06, Ashley Yakeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: HNOP: Haskell No Operation Could you perhaps write a Haskell Weekly News entry for this? It might also be worth contacting Andres Löh and seeing if we can get a late entry into the Haskell Communities and Activities Report, this seems criti

[haskell] ANNOUNCE: HNOP 0.1

2006-06-30 Thread mvanier
Split objects? What's that? I'm running this on Linux (Debian unstable). Mike Donald Bruce Stewart wrote: mvanier: Incidentally, on my machine the compiled code is 2759360 bytes long unstripped and 1491240 stripped. One has to wonder what all those bytes are doing. I hope this doesn't s

Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: HNOP 0.1

2006-06-30 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
mvanier: > Incidentally, on my machine the compiled code is 2759360 bytes long > unstripped and 1491240 stripped. One has to wonder what all those bytes > are doing. I hope this doesn't sound petty; I love haskell and ghc, but > 2.8 meg for a no-op program seems a bit excessive. Hmm. Sounds l

Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: HNOP 0.1

2006-06-30 Thread mvanier
Incidentally, on my machine the compiled code is 2759360 bytes long unstripped and 1491240 stripped. One has to wonder what all those bytes are doing. I hope this doesn't sound petty; I love haskell and ghc, but 2.8 meg for a no-op program seems a bit excessive. I think the program could als

Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: HNOP 0.1

2006-06-30 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
Alistair_Bayley: > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ashley Yakeley > > > > HNOP does nothing. Here's a sample session to illustrate: > > > > $ ./hnop > > $ > > > > The code is written entirely in plain Haskell 98 and makes no > > use of FFI > > or impure fu

RE: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: HNOP 0.1

2006-06-30 Thread Bayley, Alistair
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ashley Yakeley > > HNOP does nothing. Here's a sample session to illustrate: > > $ ./hnop > $ > > The code is written entirely in plain Haskell 98 and makes no > use of FFI > or impure functions. The source is available in a d

[Haskell] ANNOUNCE: HNOP 0.1

2006-06-29 Thread Ashley Yakeley
HNOP: Haskell No Operation A first version of HNOP 0.1 is now available under a simple permissive license. This version should be considered "beta" quality, though I don't know of any bugs. http://semantic.org/hnop.tar.gz HNOP does nothing. Here's a sample session to illustrate: $ ./hnop