Re: [Haskell] hscpp

2004-09-27 Thread John Meacham
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 11:18:29PM +0200, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: > Hello, > > there was some discussion about a Haskell-friendly CPP a while ago. What > happend to this project? I desperately need such a preprocessor. > > CPP 3.3.4, which I use now, is not usable for me because you cannot hav

Re: [Haskell] hscpp

2004-09-28 Thread Malcolm Wallace
Wolfgang Jeltsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > there was some discussion about a Haskell-friendly CPP a while ago. What > happend to this project? I desperately need such a preprocessor. It is called cpphs, and is currently at version 0.7. I think it is feature-complete now, and has behaviour

Re: [Haskell] hscpp

2004-09-28 Thread Graham Klyne
Malcolm Wallace implemented it... I've used it and it works fine for me. There's an announcement somewhere in the Haskell mailing lists. Here it is: http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/fp/cpphs/ #g -- At 23:18 27/09/04 +0200, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: Hello, there was some discussion about a Haskell-friend

Re: [Haskell] hscpp

2004-09-28 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Dienstag, 28. September 2004 11:51 schrieb Malcolm Wallace: > Wolfgang Jeltsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > there was some discussion about a Haskell-friendly CPP a while ago. What > > happend to this project? I desperately need such a preprocessor. > > It is called cpphs, and is currently

Re: [Haskell] hscpp

2004-09-28 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:53:00PM +0200, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: > > Is there any effort to package this as a Debian package? Or has this > already be done? As far as I know it hasn't been done yet. > It would be very good if cpphs would enter the next stable Debian > release (3.1). I'm told

Re: [Haskell] hscpp

2004-09-28 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Dienstag, 28. September 2004 16:24 schrieb Ian Lynagh: > [...] > > It would be very good if cpphs would enter the next stable Debian > > release (3.1). > > I'm told this is still possible, so I'll have a look at it unless > someone else says they already have or want to. Thanks a lot. > Thank