Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
| As membership of "the Haskell community" is not well-defined, and voting
| would potentially be open to abuse if anyone were able to vote, we
| propose that the committee should choose their replacements from open
| nominations.
I agree with the problem, and I think y
2010/9/6 Manuel M T Chakravarty :
> Ian Lynagh:
>> To fix this problem, we propose that we create a "haskell.org
>> committee", which is responsible for answering these sorts of questions,
>> although for some questions they may choose to poll the community at
>> large if they think appropriate.
>
