[Haskell-cafe] Re: Analysing Haskell Program

Thomas Davie gmail.com> writes: > On 1 Aug 2008, at 16:01, Roberto D'Aprile wrote: > > > Hello to everybody > > > > I'm using haskell for some research work and now i need to evaluate > > the performance of some simple haskell programs in particular > > information on the like, CPU cycles, b

[Haskell-cafe] GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

the package author need only run: $ ./Setup configure $ ./Setup build $ ./Setup test to produce a file detailing the results of the test suite. I apologize for taking up your time with a such a lengthy message, and eagerly await your feedback! Thanks! -- Thomas Tuegel [1] http://hackage

Re: [Haskell-cafe] GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Rogan Creswick wrote: > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Tuegel wrote: > There are a few frameworks that provide limited degrees of this > functionality.  I've recently added to test-framework so that the > results can be gathered into a

Re: [Haskell-cafe] GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

see where their packages are failing. Certainly, any single package author could write a tool to do this for any single package's tests, but now we have a common tool everyone can use simply by writing tests. To summarize: everyone's life is easier if we do this bit of plumbing for them. -- Thomas Tuegel ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

[Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

is very helpful! Thanks! -- Thomas Tuegel Throughout this proposal, examples are given to indicate how a package author would utilize the features proposed here. In all these examples, suppose that the programmer is the author of the 'haskell-foo' package, which exposes the module &#

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

r a proper 'Test' stanza in the package description file and leave it at that? Thanks! -- Thomas Tuegel ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

or this proposal, it's all tangential.) > See my comments about running multiple test suites, and parameterized > test suites above.  I think richer parameters are necessary. > (possibly just a --pass-through flag that hands all the subsequent > parameters off to the test executable(s)) That is an excellent suggestion that I will definitely adopt in my eventual proposal. Thanks! -- Thomas Tuegel ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

I apologize for spamming, but it only just occurred to me how to get the best aspects of both our ideas: On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Thomas Tuegel wrote: > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Rogan Creswick wrote: >> The existing Executable sections may serve the need fine, if

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

executables get cut from the PackageDescription. Am I missing something? -- Thomas Tuegel ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

hackage test agents) and convert to other formats (e.g. > integration in companies in-house systems). Rogan mentioned possible upcoming support in test-framework for JUnit XML as an output format for test results. That certainly seems to be widely supported; do you think it is suitable? -- Thomas Tuegel ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

and/or pointers, I'd love to hear them! Thanks! -- Thomas Tuegel ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

read my proposal at the GSoC site, but the proposal submission form kinda mangled my formatting. There is a public Google Documents version of my proposal at https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AZzNFnSY9FOeZGd6MnQ4cWNfM2Q2N2J0OWZn&hl=en which should be up-to-date and contain al

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

test result data structure? > As you suggest in your other post, it would make sense to adapt > test-framework to implement the interface specified by Cabal. I agree, as well; this is essentially the approach I took in my proposal. -- Thomas Tuegel __

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: GSoC: Improving Cabal's Test Support

ir tests, they can give them independent test stanzas in the .cabal file. Either they put the tests in different executables, or the test framework can provide command-line options for turning tests on and off. Those are the big two usage scenarios we've discussed for the

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Cabal test interface, what/where is it?

own bug. A patch is available, so it should be fixed in the next version. -- Thomas Tuegel ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Re: [Haskell-cafe] The State of Testing?

e to put any flag gymnastics in your .cabal file. If this doesn't work for you, please let me know, because it's a bug. Thanks! -- Thomas Tuegel ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Re: [Haskell-cafe] The State of Testing?

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Christoph Breitkopf wrote: > Hello Thomas, > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Thomas Tuegel wrote: >> >> First, as author of the test suite code, let me apologize for the >> terrible documentation. >> >> This is absolutely N