On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 02:21, Haisheng Wu wrote:
> Thanks Oliver. That's good enough.
> I was ever curious about whether parse String to the function rather
> than a mapping.
>
GHC has the ability to embed an interpreter. You do not want to use it.
If you want Perl/Python/Ruby, please use tho
Thanks Oliver. That's good enough.
I was ever curious about whether parse String to the function rather
than a mapping.
-Haisheng
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Oliver Batchelor wrote:
> You could store your test data in a named map e.g.
>
> import qualified Data.Map as M
> import System
>
>
You could store your test data in a named map e.g.
import qualified Data.Map as M
import System
testSets :: M.Map String [Int]
testSets = M.fromList
[ ("testdata", testdata)
, ("testdata2", testdata2)
]
f :: Int -> Something
f =
main = do
[arg] <- getArgs
case M.lookup
Hi there,
Do you have any comments / suggestions for the following scenario?
I have two list and a function over list
testdata :: [Int]
testdata2 :: [Int]
f testdata = map g testdata
What I like to do is choosing what test data via command line arguments.
i.e. test.hs testdata2 will r
