On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
> The great thing about the Haddock redesign is that the content has been
> separated from the style. If opinions about the style are sufficiently
> divided we can provide a style switcher on the docs we ship with GHC, and
> make that the defa
On 06/08/10 03:15, Jeff Zaroyko wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Dino Morelli wrote:
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Mark Lentczner wrote:
One thing I haven't seen anyone else comment on is the width of the new
docs. I have a large (26") monitor
Hi Lars,
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Lars Viklund wrote:
> The survey seems to be inactive, by the way.
>
It's because Mark already posted the results. :)
Cheers,
Johan
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.or
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:00:16AM -0400, Mark Lentczner wrote:
> The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
> generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
> community's input before we put it in the main release.
>
> Please take a look, an
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Wouldn't the docs be unusable if it were in French even if
> Haddock handled unicode characters correctly?
Joke aside, for software to be released, a French documentation indeed
wouldn't be of much use. The langage of technology and scienc
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 01:00, David Virebayre
wrote:
> I prefer the new look.
>
> That being said, I'd rather like haddock handling unicode characters
> in comments, at the moment it's unusable if I want to write comments
> in French.
Wouldn't the docs be unusable if it were in French even if
Had
I prefer the new look.
That being said, I'd rather like haddock handling unicode characters
in comments, at the moment it's unusable if I want to write comments
in French.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mail
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Ben Millwood wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Dino Morelli wrote:
One thing I haven't seen anyone else comment on is the width of the new
docs. I have a large (26") monitor and use the browser full-screen (with
xmonad, so even more screen space). When I load these pa
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Dino Morelli wrote:
>
> One thing I haven't seen anyone else comment on is the width of the new
> docs. I have a large (26") monitor and use the browser full-screen (with
> xmonad, so even more screen space). When I load these pages, particularly
> the non-frame one
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Johan Tibell wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Dino Morelli wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Mark Lentczner wrote:
>> One thing I haven't seen anyone else comment on is the width of the new
>> docs. I have a large (26") monitor and use the browser full-scre
On 5 August 2010 23:35, Dino Morelli wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Mark Lentczner wrote:
>
> One thing I haven't seen anyone else comment on is the width of the new
> docs. I have a large (26") monitor and use the browser full-screen (with
> xmonad, so even more screen space). When I load these pag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/5/10 09:35 , Dino Morelli wrote:
> Please say no, it's a disappointing trend that you see everywhere. Like
> Twitter's web interface, for instance, very narrow.
Twitter's web interface isn't really intended for serious use, IMO.
Tweetdeck for des
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Dino Morelli wrote:
One thing I haven't seen anyone else comment on is the width of the new
docs. I have a large (26") monitor and use the browser full-screen (with
xmonad, so even more screen space). When I load these pag
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Johan Tibell wrote:
>> One thing I haven't seen anyone else comment on is the width of the new
>> docs. I have a large (26") monitor and use the browser full-screen (with
>> xmonad, so even more screen space). When I load these pages, particularly
>> the non-frame
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Dino Morelli wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Mark Lentczner wrote:
>
> > The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
> generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
> community's input before we put it in the main
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Mark Lentczner wrote:
The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
community's input before we put it in the main release.
Please take a look, and then give us your feedback
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/4/10 05:11 , Magnus Therning wrote:
> Also very good looking. Does the current stable version of Haddock really
> create a frame version?
> I've never seen one before...
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/current/html/libraries/frames.html
- --
b
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 06:00, Mark Lentczner wrote:
> > The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
> generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
> community's input before we put it
On 10-08-04 01:00 AM, Mark Lentczner wrote:
Sample pages: http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/snap-xhtml/index.html
On the Contents page, among the collapsable trees: when I click on a
link that is also a parent, such as Snap.Http.Server and
Text.Templating.Heist, it has the undesirable side effe
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Mark Lentczner wrote:
> The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
> generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
> community's input before we put it in the main release.
>
> Please take a look, and then giv
ht
be nice.
Best, B
> Message: 14
> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:56:58 +0100
> From: Thomas Schilling
> Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Preview the new haddock look and take a
> short survey
> To: aditya siram
> Cc: haddock , haskell-cafe@haskell.org
> Message-ID:
>
This is something I've wanted for a long time, but I always intended
to just submit a patch since it would be trivial, but maybe other
people have an opinion about it too:
I've always wanted a button to collapse or maybe toggle all expanded
branches. Once a library gets large, it's easier to navi
On 4 August 2010 15:44, aditya siram wrote:
> I really like the color scheme and the Javadoc looking frames.
>
> One suggestion I can make is to have the index show all the functions with
> type signatures without having to pick a letter. A lot of times I'll be
> looking for a function of a certai
I really like the color scheme and the Javadoc looking frames.
One suggestion I can make is to have the index show all the functions with
type signatures without having to pick a letter. A lot of times I'll be
looking for a function of a certain signature as opposed to a name. Indeed
an index of t
A few points,
* The text in Synopsis part is typically wide. (See
http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/snap-xhtml/heist/Text-Templating-Heist.htmlwith
Ocean style)
I think it would be more *usable *if it was at the bottom of the page (again
with a similar button and open/close toggling effect)
* On my
Mark Lentczner wrote:
> The Haddock team...
> Please take a look, and then give us your feedback
Very very nice. I took the survey, but here are some comments
I left out.
I like the idea of the Snappy style the best, but there are two
serious problems with it, at least in my browser (Safari):
1.
On 4 August 2010 10:11, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 06:00, Mark Lentczner wrote:
>> The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
>> generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
>> community's input before we put it in the
Great! I like it a lot, but a couple of minor suggestions regarding the
"tree" view of modules. I think it would be more attractive (and
space-efficient) to have them indent a little less and to provide some sort
of visual link, in the form of even subtle branches, from parents to
children. A bit l
On Aug 4, 2010, at 5:11 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Does the current stable version of Haddock really
> create a frame version?
> I've never seen one before...
Yes it does. For example, the standaed GHC book packages doc has the frames
version here:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.1
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic writes:
>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 06:00, Mark Lentczner wrote:
>>> Frame version: http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/snap-xhtml/frames.html
>>
> I quite like this new approach
Dammit, I just realised as I went to do the survey that the old framed
approach is almost identical t
Magnus Therning writes:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 06:00, Mark Lentczner wrote:
>> The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
>> generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
>> community's input before we put it in the main release.
>>
>> P
2010/8/4 Mark Lentczner :
> The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
> generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
> community's input before we put it in the main release.
>
> Please take a look, and then give us your feedback through a
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 06:00, Mark Lentczner wrote:
> The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
> generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
> community's input before we put it in the main release.
>
> Please take a look, and then give
The Haddock team has spent the last few months revamping the look of the
generated output. We're pretty close to done, but we'd like to get the
community's input before we put it in the main release.
Please take a look, and then give us your feedback through a short survey
Sample pages: http:/
34 matches
Mail list logo
