David Virebayre writes:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Jon Fairbairn
> wrote:
>
>> [1] A pet peeve of mine is "x supports y" being used backwards (as in
>> "our application supports windows Vista", which would only make sense if
>> it were something like a system tool that stopped Vista cras
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Jon Fairbairn
wrote:
> [1] A pet peeve of mine is "x supports y" being used backwards (as in
> "our application supports windows Vista", which would only make sense if
> it were something like a system tool that stopped Vista crashing.
(Not a native English speak
skell-cafe] Re: Curried function terminology
To: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Date: Monday, October 5, 2009, 5:52 AM
michael rice writes:
> This is from Learn You A Haskell:
>
> ==
>
> "Curried functions
>
> Every function in Haskell officially only takes one
> parame
Am Montag 05 Oktober 2009 11:52:17 schrieb Jon Fairbairn:
> michael rice writes:
> > This is from Learn You A Haskell:
> > The language (in CAPS) in the above two paragraphs seems to
> > be backwards.
>
> It is. "5 is applied to that function" should be "5 is supplied to that
> function" (or that
michael rice writes:
> This is from Learn You A Haskell:
>
> ==
>
> "Curried functions
>
> Every function in Haskell officially only takes one
> parameter. So how is it possible that we defined and used
> several functions that take more than one parameter so far?
> Well, it's a clever tr
