On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 07:20:20PM +, Aaron Denney wrote:
> On 2005-05-03, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > An interesting challenge would be to rewrite fftw in haskell, and see how
> > close one could come to the performance of the original... :)
>
> What precisely do you mean by t
Aaron Denney wrote:
> On 2005-05-03, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > An interesting challenge would be to rewrite fftw in haskell, and see how
> > close one could come to the performance of the original... :)
>
> What precisely do you mean by that? FFTW is C code generated by OCaml?
>
On 2005-05-03, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An interesting challenge would be to rewrite fftw in haskell, and see how
> close one could come to the performance of the original... :)
What precisely do you mean by that? FFTW is C code generated by OCaml?
Do you want to retarget ti so t
On 2005-05-03, Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg Buchholz wrote:
>
>> You might find the "The Great Computer Language Shootout"
>> informative...
>>
>> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/
>
> Thanks!
>
> That's a great resource. At first glance, Haskell seems to do well over
