Hi all,
A quick search indicates that this problem has come up in the past,
but I haven't seen any solutions yet. I'm working on the next
Persistent release, and one of the changes is that the included
sqlite3 C library has been updated (I believe that's the trigger
here). I can compile programs a
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Michael Snoyman wrote:
> test.hs:
> /home/ubuntu/.cabal/lib/persistent-sqlite-1.0.0/ghc-7.4.1/HSpersistent-sqlite-1.0.0.o:
> unknown symbol `stat64'
> test.hs: test.hs: unable to load package `persistent-sqlite-1.0.0'
>
The immediate cause is that some C source f
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Michael Snoyman
> wrote:
>>
>> test.hs:
>> /home/ubuntu/.cabal/lib/persistent-sqlite-1.0.0/ghc-7.4.1/HSpersistent-sqlite-1.0.0.o:
>> unknown symbol `stat64'
>> test.hs: test.hs: unable to load package `per
On 07/11/2012 05:12 PM, Michael Snoyman wrote:
>
> Thanks for the feedback. However, looking at sqlite3.c, I see the
> necessary #include statements:
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> I'm confident that none of my code is making calls to stat/stat64 via
> the FFI. In case it makes a diff
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> On 07/11/2012 05:12 PM, Michael Snoyman wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback. However, looking at sqlite3.c, I see the
> > necessary #include statements:
> >
> > #include
> > #include
> > #include
> >
> > I'm confident that none of my
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Michael Snoyman wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
>
>> On 07/11/2012 05:12 PM, Michael Snoyman wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks for the feedback. However, looking at sqlite3.c, I see the
>> > necessary #include statements:
>> >
>> > #incl
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 06:29:41PM +0300, Michael Snoyman wrote:
> I've come up with a minimal example that demonstrates this problem. The
> crux of the matter is the following C code:
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> typedef int stat_func(const char*, struc
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:07:05AM -0500, Tristan Ravitch wrote:
> Are you trying this on a 32 bit system? And when you compiled that C
> program, did you try to add
>
> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
>
> to the compile command? When I define those the resulting object file
> from
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Tristan Ravitch wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 06:29:41PM +0300, Michael Snoyman wrote:
> > I've come up with a minimal example that demonstrates this problem. The
> > crux of the matter is the following C code:
> >
> > #include
> > #include
> > #in
On Jul 12, 2012 7:13 PM, "Tristan Ravitch" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:07:05AM -0500, Tristan Ravitch wrote:
> > Are you trying this on a 32 bit system? And when you compiled that C
> > program, did you try to add
> >
> > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
> >
> > to the com
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 07:20:39PM +0300, Michael Snoyman wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2012 7:13 PM, "Tristan Ravitch" wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:07:05AM -0500, Tristan Ravitch wrote:
> > > Are you trying this on a 32 bit system? And when you compiled that C
> > > program, did you try to ad
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Tristan Ravitch wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 07:20:39PM +0300, Michael Snoyman wrote:
> > On Jul 12, 2012 7:13 PM, "Tristan Ravitch" wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:07:05AM -0500, Tristan Ravitch wrote:
> > > > Are you trying this on a 32 bit sys
12 matches
Mail list logo
