Re: [hlcoders] Many thanks to Valve and Alfred!

2005-07-07 Thread Tom Edwards
Well, uh, if we were DJs it would be... Matt Parkins wrote: Cue, not Queue. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Edwards Sent: 07 July 2005 13:44 To: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Many thanks to Valve and

RE: [hlcoders] Many thanks to Valve and Alfred!

2005-07-07 Thread Matt Parkins
Cue, not Queue. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Edwards Sent: 07 July 2005 13:44 To: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Many thanks to Valve and Alfred! *Queue 'should have been there from the start'

Re: [hlcoders] Many thanks to Valve and Alfred!

2005-07-07 Thread Ben Davison
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] *Queue 'we want this' and 'why are you not doing this'* On 7/7/05, Tom Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > *Queue 'should have been there from the start' complaints* > > Mattie Casper wrote: > > > I love the new update. Not least because of th

Re: [hlcoders] Many thanks to Valve and Alfred!

2005-07-07 Thread Tom Edwards
*Queue 'should have been there from the start' complaints* Mattie Casper wrote: I love the new update. Not least because of the new addition of the API InsertServerCommand(): > Actually, there is one change (nothing that would break a plugin). We > added this function: > virtual void Ins

[hlcoders] Many thanks to Valve and Alfred!

2005-07-07 Thread Mattie Casper
I love the new update. Not least because of the new addition of the API InsertServerCommand(): > Actually, there is one change (nothing that would break a plugin). We > added this function: > virtual void InsertServerCommand( const char *str ) = 0; > > To the end of the IVEngineServer i