On 13.9.2014, at 5.50, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 12/09/2014 22:23, Markus Stenberg wrote:
> ...
>> 1) Can we assume secure L2 and/or appropriate device
>> configuration by the manufacturer/ISP(/user)? (This is what I
>> can assume in my own home.)
> I'm not sure I fully understand this questio
On 12/09/2014 22:23, Markus Stenberg wrote:
...
> 1) Can we assume secure L2 and/or appropriate device
> configuration by the manufacturer/ISP(/user)? (This is what I
> can assume in my own home.)
I'm not sure I fully understand this question, but certainly
there a vast numbers of insecure home 80
On 09/12/2014 03:23 AM, Markus Stenberg wrote:
I decided to take a look at the homenet architecture draft and compare the
requirements there with what is defined for HNCP as of now.
Section 3.6 describes security. It seems to be concerned mainly with filtering
of traffic between different netw
I decided to take a look at the homenet architecture draft and compare the
requirements there with what is defined for HNCP as of now.
Section 3.6 describes security. It seems to be concerned mainly with filtering
of traffic between different networks - for example, guest, home, and Internet.
S
> My opinion is that homenet shouldn't require new functionality in the host
> stack for it to work, but if we can present suggestions for enhancements in
> the host stack that makes things work better, and also enhance homenet to
> take advantage of enhancements in host stacks to make things wo
