Re: [hugin-ptx] 2010.0.0 on OSX 10.6.8?

Dr. Kurt schrieb am 18.12.12 04:01: I can't speak for the latest and greatest; but I've been using 2011.4 on my Intel Mac running 10.6.8 for quite a while now and I'm pretty pleased with it. I can certainly recommend upgrading at least to this version. I stitched this panorama

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Visualize seam

It looks like Stephan Peter made the fix. But I guess it was a functional error rather than a fatal one as described in that thread. In this case it appears to be the cause of the stoppage. But perhaps there's more behind the stoppage than just this bug. On Monday, December 17, 2012 10:30:44 PM

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Visualize seam

My experience with the bug never kept it from finishing a stitch. I didn't fix anything. On 12/17/2012 02:47 PM, JohnPW wrote: Hmm . . . Google tells me that this is a problem that some of you (Gnome Nomad, kfj, et al.) have seen and fixed before. A bug that sets the compression incorrectly: As

Re: [hugin-ptx] 2010.0.0 on OSX 10.6.8?

I can't speak for the latest and greatest; but I've been using 2011.4 on my Intel Mac running 10.6.8 for quite a while now and I'm pretty pleased with it. I can certainly recommend upgrading at least to this version. I have run into problems when trying to install/compare multiple versions - I su

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin -> Faux Exposure Brackets -> enfuse

Yes, that's what I was alluding to. But what about what I'm asking below? Theoretically tiff 16 bit tiff brackets converted from a 12 (or 16 bit) RAW file contain more information than a single one. But in practice is there really much difference between enfusing them and making faux bracketed i

[hugin-ptx] Re: Visualize seam

Hmm . . . Google tells me that this is a problem that some of you (Gnome Nomad, kfj, et al.) have seen and fixed before. A bug that sets the compression incorrectly: As seen Here: http://markmail.org . . .

[hugin-ptx] Re: Visualize seam

I was interested to see the visualize output, but it didn't quite work for me. I put --visualize in the Enblend options box in Hugin (shouldn't that work?) I always get this error: enblend: info: loading next image: Antietam House 5Z.tif 1/1 enblend: info: loading next image: Antietam House

[hugin-ptx] Re: 360 video camera on kickstarter

That's pretty cool! Nice job. On Monday, December 17, 2012 2:23:54 AM UTC-6, Naked Robot wrote: > > maybe this is interesting for the group > > > www.kickstarter.com/projects/1996234044/sphericam-the-easy-360o-video-camera > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin -> Faux Exposure Brackets -> enfuse

Actually, I was curious how using this script on a high bit depth tiff extracted from a good RAW file would compare with: enfusing 6 tiffs extracted from the same RAW file at 6 different exposure levels. In other words, given RAW and tiff files with similar depth of information how does the sig

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin -> Faux Exposure Brackets -> enfuse

On 12/17/2012 12:51 AM, paul womack wrote: JohnPW wrote: This is very cool (and, amazingly, I've gotten it to work form me.) I'm still trying to figure out how to run the perl script, but I'm happy I at least have the commands working on the command line! Any way, I'm curious, does this scri

Re: [hugin-ptx] 360 video camera on kickstarter

Cool! Congratulations for the project! Carlos E G Carvalho (Cartola) http://cartola.org/360 http://www.panoforum.com.br/ 2012/12/17 Naked Robot <360cit...@gmail.com> > maybe this is interesting for the group > > > www.kickstarter.com/projects/1996234044/sphericam-the-easy-360o-video-camera >

[hugin-ptx] "degrees of view" always for equidistant fisheye?

Why do the "degrees of view" in Hugin's "Camera and Lens" tab always refer to rectilinear or equidistant? I can choose stereographic, equisolid, orthographic ... I only see the FOV for the equidistant case. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin an

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin -> Faux Exposure Brackets -> enfuse

JohnPW wrote: This is very cool (and, amazingly, I've gotten it to work form me.) I'm still trying to figure out how to run the perl script, but I'm happy I at least have the commands working on the command line! Any way, I'm curious, does this script produce essentially the same results as

Re: [hugin-ptx] 2010.0.0 on OSX 10.6.8?

Hi, the latest hugin 2012.0.0 works great on Intel Macs with 10.6, so just download the new version if you don't use a PPC Mac. http://hugin.sourceforge.net/download/ If you're on a PPC Mac: Hugin 2011.4.0 works on my G5 (PPC)

[hugin-ptx] Re: colors and brightness change when stitching

Michael, Something else you can try, add "--no-ciecam" to the commandline for enblend and enfuse, see if that makes a difference. On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 4:57:26 AM UTC-5, Michael wrote: > > Here is an example of the original image, and the same part cropped from > the big stitched ima

Re: [hugin-ptx] colors and brightness change when stitching

On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:55:02 +1100, David Haberthür wrote: Ciao Michael. I'm an avid fan of hugin, but for stitching microscope photos I recommend http://www.xuvtools.org/, which is especially adapted for this task. Michael, If the limitations of xuvtools make it unsuitable, try hugin again

Re: [hugin-ptx] colors and brightness change when stitching

Ciao Michael. I'm an avid fan of hugin, but for stitching microscope photos I recommend http://www.xuvtools.org/, which is especially adapted for this task. David On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Michael wrote: > Hello, I'm trying to stitch some photos I took with a microscope into one > big im

[hugin-ptx] 360 video camera on kickstarter

maybe this is interesting for the group www.kickstarter.com/projects/1996234044/sphericam-the-easy-360o-video-camera -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at