On 16 Jan., 02:30, john doe wrote:
> How about an integration with hugin and batch mode?
Please be more specific. What do you mean? Of course it's integrated
with hugin, that's the whole point. Do you mean it should be able to
trigger the batch processor?
Kay
--
You received this message bec
How about an integration with hugin and batch mode?
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12 Jan., 20:08, Pablo d'Angelo wrote:
> > Hi Kay,
>
> > In addition to the basic Data model (as you seem to have done already),
> > the algorithms in hugin_base/algorithms m
On 12 Jan., 20:08, Pablo d'Angelo wrote:
> Hi Kay,
> In addition to the basic Data model (as you seem to have done already),
> the algorithms in hugin_base/algorithms might be useful for scripting
> workflows. Here, maybe only the static driver functions are required in
> the scripting language
On 12 Jan., 20:08, Pablo d'Angelo wrote:
> Btw. is your code available in some repo? Maybe a new hugin_scripting
> branch would be a good idea.
Have a look at
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/ab1f0df18aaa247d#
I put the stuff online today.
Kay
--
You received
On 12 Jan., 20:08, Pablo d'Angelo wrote:
> In addition to the basic Data model (as you seem to have done already),
> the algorithms in hugin_base/algorithms might be useful for scripting
> workflows. Here, maybe only the static driver functions are required in
> the scripting language as the mu
Hi Kay,
Am 10.01.2011 12:39, schrieb kfj:
I have set out creating a scripting interface for hugin.
Great, I think that hugin can benefit greatly from such an interface,
both for custom utilities, as well as quick prototyping of new ideas.
So the next thing that I feel needs to be done bef
