Re: [I2nsf] Should we call "South Bound Interface" for the interface between "controller <-> NSF", and "North Bound Interface" for the interface between "Client <-> controller"?

Hi, I think it is better to have crisp and clear terminology, and make the changes now, rather than wait and end up with ambiguous or confusing documents. While your clarifications are helpful, I don't think that they address my concerns, and they definitely don't address Diego's concerns (which

Re: [I2nsf] Should we call "South Bound Interface" for the interface between "controller <-> NSF", and "North Bound Interface" for the interface between "Client <-> controller"?

Hi Linda, During the I2NSF early stage (before the WG was created), "capability interface" was used to represent the interface between controller <-> NSF, and "service interface" was used to represent the interface between the Client <-> controller. The term "capability interface" doesn't